On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:17, Bernhard Reiter said:
> Which IETF OpenPGP working group members are you referring to?
That should be obvious with just a little research.
> What of their actions will be a problem for OpenPG from our point of view?
Instead of finalizing the draft started in 2015, the
Werner,
Am Dienstag 13 Dezember 2022 16:36:24 schrieb Werner Koch via Gnupg-users:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:21, Karel van Gruiten said:
> > I am only a user, but I wonder why they stick to the 2.2-series and do
>
> Probably because there is an interest conflict between the GnuPG
> maintainers in D
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:21, Karel van Gruiten said:
> I am only a user, but I wonder why they stick to the 2.2-series and do
Probably because there is an interest conflict between the GnuPG
maintainers in Debian and those who want to turn OpenPGP into something
very different (i.e. new IETF OpenPG
Am Sonntag 11 Dezember 2022 13:19:11 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> The Debians may be waiting for the 2.4 release (which was announced as the
> next stable release after 2.2).
Unlikely, it seems more like the maintainers were less active.
2.3 is on the wishlist (since October), you may want to follow
On Samstag, 10. Dezember 2022 22:21:51 CET Karel van Gruiten via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Debians next release Bookworm is scheduled for mid 2023 an the first
> deadlines are approaching in January. I am only a user, but I wonder why
> they stick to the 2.2-series and do not jump to the 2.3-builds as
Hello!
Debians next release Bookworm is scheduled for mid 2023 an the first deadlines
are approaching in January.
I am only a user, but I wonder why they stick to the 2.2-series and do not jump
to the 2.3-builds as they have many new algorithms and should be quiet stable
after all the Point-rele
