Re: Oracle behavior in Gnupg? // (was 'possible bug in gpg?')

2012-07-31 Thread Ben McGinnes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 31/07/12 1:14 AM, David Shaw wrote: Yes, this is expected behavior. It follows from what I explained earlier in this thread. When you use --override-session-key, you bypass the quick check (after all, you gave the override key - what is

Oracle behavior in Gnupg? // (was 'possible bug in gpg?')

2012-07-30 Thread vedaal
While playing around with --override-session key , have noticed that gpg gives many different sets of error messages when trying out different session keys. Here is an interesting example: First, the gnupg encrypted text: -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32) Comment:

Re: Oracle behavior in Gnupg? // (was 'possible bug in gpg?')

2012-07-30 Thread David Shaw
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:45 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: While playing around with --override-session key , have noticed that gpg gives many different sets of error messages when trying out different session keys. [examples] Borh examples give error messages identical to the first one,

Re: Oracle behavior in Gnupg? // (was 'possible bug in gpg?')

2012-07-30 Thread Thomas Harning Jr.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: While playing around with --override-session key , have noticed that gpg gives many different sets of error messages when trying out different session keys. ... CUT ... Borh examples give error messages identical to the first one,