> Can you cite the case #. All I could find is an old "local appeals court in
> Washington, D.C." ruling. I found nothing under the US Supreme Court.
It was a DC Court of Appeals decision, not SCOTUS. It appears unlikely
to hit SCOTUS.
https://www.dccourts.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/15-CF-3
On 09/22/2017 11:55 AM, Jerry wrote:
> Can you cite the case #. All I could find is an old "local appeals court in
> Washington, D.C." ruling. I found nothing under the US Supreme Court.
See https://www.dccourts.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/15-CF-322.pdf
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
N
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:22:13 -0400, Robert J. Hansen stated:
>Good news for US citizens: _Prince Jones v US_ was decided Thursday.
>The important text from the opinion is recreated here, and the
>implications for encrypted email follow.
>
>* * * * *
>
>But in addition to the fact that people reaso
Good news for US citizens: _Prince Jones v US_ was decided Thursday.
The important text from the opinion is recreated here, and the
implications for encrypted email follow.
* * * * *
But in addition to the fact that people reasonably value and hope to
protect the privacy of their location informa
