RE: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Aha! This makes a lot of sense. Thanks Werner! Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:33 AM > To: Jeffrey Stedfast > Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: Problems with GPGME returning &q

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-10 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 00:57, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > I spotted the fact that I was (incorrectly) using > gpgme_op_decrypt_verify() when I think I should be using > gpgme_op_decrypt(), so I fixed that but I still get “Not Implemented”. The reason why it shows "Not implemented" is that you use

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Gah I hate Outlook which makes replying inline impossible :\ Outlook will indent but not add “> “ to quoted lines, so be aware of that as you read this email ( On 3/6/17, 9:41 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:20, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > I'm working on re-impl

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-06 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:20, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora > 25) instead of using my own custom logic for fork()ing/exec()ing gpg & Great, we like the use of the GPGME API. I guess GMime is not used by Evolution ;-) Which GnuP

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-04 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Hey Werner, No worries – I know how busy things can get around a release. Jeff On 3/4/17, 7:01 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote: Hi Jeff, On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:04, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Soneone of us will get back to you on Monday.

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-04 Thread Werner Koch
Hi Jeff, On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:04, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Soneone of us will get back to you on Monday. We have been pretty busy with the 2.1.19 release the last week. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesg

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-03-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Anyone have any thoughts on this? On 2/27/17, 9:20 AM, "Gnupg-users on behalf of Jeffrey Stedfast" wrote: Hi all, I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora 25) instead of using my own custom logic for fork()ing/exec()ing gpg & parsing the status-fd

Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

2017-02-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Hi all, I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora 25) instead of using my own custom logic for fork()ing/exec()ing gpg & parsing the status-fd output to do PGP encryption and I've gotten that to work just fine for PGP, but I am having trouble using nearly identical l