On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:25, gn...@oneiroi.net said:
Discussion, yes - tough one I think. If you mean by that pushing syscall
modification to mainstream - it's not
mmap already has a lot of flags. Adding another flag value should be an
easy task - assuming that one wants to use another bit
Excerpts from Werner Koch's message of Fri Jan 14 21:01:45 +0100 2011:
It would definitely be helpful because it makes a safe installation much
easier. It will be used automagically and thus one does not need to
fiddle with suspend scripts. All the password managers would benefit
form that
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:50, nils.faer...@kernelconcepts.de said:
I could write a very simple driver which provides a mmap()able memory
area which the application can use, protected by the kernel, and which
will be automatically cleared upon suspend.
Would that solve the problem?
Yes.
How
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:55, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
Usually, the screen saver will be activated by the OS well before
hibernation begins.
Sure, there are a lot of ways to hook into the suspend process. I was
talking about a standard signal (SIGABOUTTOSUSPEND) so that gpg-agent
could install
Hi!
Am 14.01.2011 09:34, schrieb Werner Koch:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:50, nils.faer...@kernelconcepts.de said:
I could write a very simple driver which provides a mmap()able memory
area which the application can use, protected by the kernel, and which
will be automatically cleared upon
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:06, nils.faer...@kernelconcepts.de said:
So, what do you think, would it be worth the effort?
If it would help GnuPG and if you would like to use it I would offer to
implement it and try to push it upstream.
It would definitely be helpful because it makes a safe
Hello.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:01:45PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:06, nils.faer...@kernelconcepts.de said:
So, what do you think, would it be worth the effort?
If it would help GnuPG and if you would like to use it I would offer to
implement it and try to push it
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:29, ds...@jabberwocky.com said:
So GnuPG can't do this alone, but there are ways to configure GnuPG alongside
other packages and/or the OS to be safe(r) here. For example, if you can
arrange to run some commands as you are hibernating, you could get gpg-agent
to
Am 13.01.2011 11:39, schrieb Werner Koch:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:29, ds...@jabberwocky.com said:
So GnuPG can't do this alone, but there are ways to configure GnuPG
alongside other packages and/or the OS to be safe(r) here. For example, if
you can arrange to run some commands as you are
When you close a laptop, Windows (or Mac OS X, or Linux, or what-have-you)
takes a snapshot of memory contents and writes it to disk. This can be a
really big problem, since encryption keys, passphrases, and so forth are
written out in the process. For instance, if you have gpg-agent set up
On 13-01-2011 11:22, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote:
This is an OS feature, not a hardware feature. Turn off hibernation. Encrypt
your swap file(s) or for Windows, go to system options and turn off swap and
reboot in safe mode, defrag your disk and delete any remaining swap file.
For Windows,
* freej...@is-not-my.name freej...@is-not-my.name [110113 11:35]:
P.S. Robert, how about trimming your line lengths!
Apple Mail sucks at this ;)
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:23, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
For Windows, TrueCrypt has a free open source solution to this in the
form of system encryption.
Does not help. Despite that we talked about hibernation, most users
don't use S4 (Suspend-to-Disk) but the system goes into S3
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:23, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
For Windows, TrueCrypt has a free open source solution to this in the
form of system encryption.
Does not help. Despite that we talked about hibernation, most users
Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org wrote on
Thu Jan 13 11:39:34 CET 2011 :
Things would be easier to handle if the OS would send a special
signal
to all processes before hibernating.
Usually, the screen saver will be activated by the OS well before
hibernation begins.
Maybe an option could be to
When you close a laptop, Windows (or Mac OS X, or Linux, or what-have-you)
takes a snapshot of memory contents and writes it to disk. This can be a
really big problem, since encryption keys, passphrases, and so forth are
written out in the process. For instance, if you have gpg-agent set up
On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
When you close a laptop, Windows (or Mac OS X, or Linux, or what-have-you)
takes a snapshot of memory contents and writes it to disk. This can be a
really big problem, since encryption keys, passphrases, and so forth are
written out in
17 matches
Mail list logo