Wow. Thanks very much for such a detailed reply. GPG can be counter-intuitive
at times, but it seems there is always a way. Shalom!
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:30 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:18, gnupg-us
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:18, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> (1) If a file is signed but the signature is incorrect, 'gpg2 -d'
> returns a non-zero status code, so the remote script knows not to
Right but as stated somewhere in the docs, you should never ever rely on
the status code fomr the binary.
I've been working on a scheme for signing binary images that we ship out to
various remote systems. The remote system expects the file to be both encrypted
and signed, but there seem to be some corner cases:
(1) If a file is signed but the signature is incorrect, 'gpg2 -d' returns a
non-zero st
