On 06/11/2013 12:23 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 11:37 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Of course he did not seriously propose the idea as a real course of
action. But it is interesting to think about.
I drive a Mustang GT with enough engine work to make it genuinely
dangerous to
On 06/11/2013 12:23 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 11:37 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Of course he did not seriously propose the idea as a real course of
action. But it is interesting to think about.
I drive a Mustang GT with enough engine work to make it genuinely
dangerous to
I drive a GMC Suburban, terrible gas mileage,
but roomy and relatively sturdy if there is an unavoidable accident by someone
driving too fast, or out of control, and slamming into me.
(Have walked away unharmed, with a minor tail-light cover break, while the
other car was totaled. (Driver wore a
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jean-David Beyer
jeandav...@verizon.netwrote:
But none of that will work on my Prius.
as much as I like cars,before this list turns into Top Gear, can we get
this thread back *on track* please?
TIA...
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the
You mean that you we should clutch to the main topic and brake any
off-topic tangents before they drive the thread completely off-road? Or are
you just tire_d of how these threads wheel around with no differential
between the main theme and non-themes, and no filter to steer the thread
back to one
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:15:08 -0400
Avi articulated:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jean-David Beyer
jeandav...@verizon.net
wrote:
But none of that will work on my Prius.
as much as I like cars,before
Il 11/06/2013 16:10, ved...@nym.hush.com ha scritto:
(It might attract also a criminal element clientele and be fairly profitable,
but then law enforcement can try to go the hardware key-logger route.)
As long as decryption is done client-side (I've used JS libraries that
could do RSA2048 in a
On 10 June 2013 10:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit hhhob...@securemecca.net wrote:
My personal observations agrees with Rob Hansen's studies 100%.
Even when required to use encryption people hate doing it and
their concept is entirely focused on the ciphering with them
thinking that people who use
Henry Hertz Hobbit hhhob...@securemecca.net:
I think I will watch the programs on the D-Day veterans
so I can get out of this time warp factor we are in right now for
a while. Those people back then weren't stupid. They cracked the
Enigma, the Lorenz, and most of the Japanese codes as well.
Hi, Reference:
From: Zece z...@riseup.net
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:19:39 +
Cut the crap. This list is for GPG encryption.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent
On 06/10/2013 08:46 AM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
snip
is because for what ever reason they want to complain like mad
about Prism but then go to Facebook and broadcast their personal
lives to the entire world. Why? I would like to say I don't
know why and that it could be used for a doctoral
My personal observations agrees with Rob Hansen's studies 100%.
Even when required to use encryption people hate doing it and
their concept is entirely focused on the ciphering with them
thinking that people who use encryption are trying to hide
something. They don't even begin to understand that
Well... most people in 1940 were not capable of cracking the Enigma or
even aware of encryption technology. In fact, most human beings are
stupid in that they do not seek to understand the inner workings of
systems around them.
This is simply a pragmatic approach: As long as something works as
On 10-06-2013 10:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
Nobody but me uses my signatures on the stuff I
deliver. It isn't because my keys aren't part of the WOT. It
is because for what ever reason they want to complain like mad
about Prism but then go to Facebook and broadcast their personal
lives
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Johan Wevers wrote:
On 10-06-2013 10:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
Nobody but me uses my signatures on the stuff I
deliver. It isn't because my keys aren't part of the WOT. It
is because for what ever reason they want to complain like mad
Sorry, I sent it privately by mistake...
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why OpenPGP is not wanted - stupid is in vogue right now
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 06:59:59 -0400
From: Jean-David Beyer jeandav...@verizon.net
Organization: Institute for Regimented Whimsey
To: Johan Wevers
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Jean-David Beyer
jeandav...@verizon.netwrote:
In fact, most no longer use e-mail, but
Facebook, Twitter, and so on.
Well, you must have a valid working e-mail address to sign up to any of the
above mentioned.
When they want to reset their passwords, they are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2013 09:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
My personal observations agrees with Rob Hansen's studies 100%.
Even when required to use encryption people hate doing it and their
concept is entirely focused on the ciphering with them thinking
On 06/10/2013 03:39 PM, Mark Rousell wrote:
I just wanted to say that you have neatly encapsulated my feelings
on the subject: Stupid is in vogue.
My concern is that it will be for a long time to come. It is
ironic that technology is, to a considerable extent, what has made
it possible. So
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Jean-David Beyer
jeandav...@verizon.netwrote:
He said the added complexity would have two benefits:
I've said for years that in the ages of dial-up internet, particularly the
DOS+Windows 3.x years, people had a barrier of entry in getting a dial-up
modem,
On 6/10/2013 11:37 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Of course he did not seriously propose the idea as a real course of
action. But it is interesting to think about.
I drive a Mustang GT with enough engine work to make it genuinely
dangerous to unprepared drivers. When I was taking a couple of
21 matches
Mail list logo
