-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 2 August 2019 at 12:50:15 PM, in
, Playfair via
Gnupg-users wrote:-
> Easier still is for her to
> create an Enigmail
> PRR associating my key with my email address
Or a group line in gpg.conf.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
On 8/1/19 4:13 PM, David wrote:
> Playfair via Gnupg-users:
>> If keys.openpgp.org won't publish a user ID other than a verified email
>> address, is its only recourse to remove the user ID? Could it instead
>> substitute the hex key ID, fingerprint or a dummy string like "User ID
>> not verified"
Playfair via Gnupg-users:
> On 8/1/19 7:37 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>>> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
>>> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
>>> have no
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:27, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> We're already in uncharted waters with the inevitable abuse of SKS, we
> need to figure out how to stabilize the ecosystem.
Most businesses do not use public keyservers at all but use their
internal PKI.
> If the PGP implementation of Open
On 8/1/19 7:37 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
>> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
>> have no User ID at all in its local key
Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users [2019-08-01T09:27:45-04] wrote:
> Here's one use case (i've got others if you want):
>
> * You have my OpenPGP certificate (with userid with e-mail address),
>but it is not published in full publicly because i do not want people
>to be able to find anyt
On Thu 2019-08-01 13:37:26 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> The user ID is important because the accompanying self-signature conveys
> important information about the keyblock. For example expiration date
> and preferences. It is true that this can also be conveyed with
> direct-key-signatures (a self
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
> have no User ID at all in its local keyring.
The user ID is important because the accompanying se
Hi MFPA--
On Sun 2019-07-28 14:12:45 +0100, MFPA via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I have the option "allow-non-selfsigned-uid" in my gpg.conf.
A bit of background first, since the documentation around
allow-non-selfsigned-uid appears to be confusing/mistaken.
the manual says:
--allow-non-selfsig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
I have the option "allow-non-selfsigned-uid" in my gpg.conf.
I downloaded a key from keys.openpgp.org with no identity information.
GnuPG told me:-
gpg: Invalid key 0x84D0F6B3F5007E2C made valid by
--allow-non-selfsigned-uid
but sti
10 matches
Mail list logo
