On Sat Aug 26 08:34:25 UTC 2017, Szczepan Zalega | Nitrokey wrote:
> Hi!
Hi!
[note that I didn't see your reply because you didn't add me in CC - I
forgot to mention i wasn't registered to the mailing lists... ]
> Nice initiative! It is good you have a script already. The more it is
> automated
On 2017-08-28 10:04:01, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 00:35, l...@anarc.at said:
>
>> I'm in the process of reviewing performance of various security tokens
>> (the Yubikeys, the FST-01, Nitrokey), and I am getting somewhat
>
> Thanks for the numbers. However, the numbers Nitrokey are a
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 00:35, l...@anarc.at said:
> I'm in the process of reviewing performance of various security tokens
> (the Yubikeys, the FST-01, Nitrokey), and I am getting somewhat
Thanks for the numbers. However, the numbers Nitrokey are are missing.
Shall I send you a "standard" Zeitcontr
Hi,
I'm in the process of reviewing performance of various security tokens
(the Yubikeys, the FST-01, Nitrokey), and I am getting somewhat
interesting (if not surprising) results:
Times are in seconds.
It looks like the Yubikey 4 is the fastest, being (only?) 10 times
slower than the CPU (i3-61
