Re: gnupg.org Listserver maybe misconfigured?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Monday 18 June 2018 at 6:18:36 PM, in , Mark Rousell wrote:- > However, due to problems with domains that > advertise p=reject > DMARC policies, more and more mail lists are now > choosing to > munge From addresses to show messages

Re: gnupg.org Listserver maybe misconfigured?

On 18/06/2018 18:24, Juergen BRUCKNER wrote: > Hello Mark! > > Thank you very much for your answer and clarificattion. My pleasure. -- Mark Rousell ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: gnupg.org Listserver maybe misconfigured?

Hello Mark! Thank you very much for your answer and clarificattion. Am 2018-06-18 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rousell: > I note that your bruckner.tk domain appears to have a p=none policy so, > if I understand all this correctly, it should not matter to you. > > In short, there is nothing to worry

Re: gnupg.org Listserver maybe misconfigured?

On 18/06/2018 17:23, Juergen BRUCKNER wrote: > Hello guys, > > could it be happen that the Server for the GnuPG.org Mailinglists is > kinda misconfigured? > > My weekly DMARC-Report says that gnupg.org sent in sum 477 Mails in the > name of the Domain 'bruckner.tk' last week. > > ---snip--- >

gnupg.org Listserver maybe misconfigured?

Hello guys, could it be happen that the Server for the GnuPG.org Mailinglists is kinda misconfigured? My weekly DMARC-Report says that gnupg.org sent in sum 477 Mails in the name of the Domain 'bruckner.tk' last week. ---snip--- gnupg.org 217.69.76.57