>To avoid that you should specify --homedir c:\testhome or something on the
>commandline to 2.1 calls. Then it will use that as a different homedir.
>e.g.: gpg --homedir c:\testhome --expert --full-gen-key
This works now like a charm.
Thanks,
Rimma
Hello,
I am using gpg4win V. 2.3.2 on a WIN7 machine, but I want to test the gnuPG
2.1.13 on the same machine, using the CLI, without interfering with the
existing gpg4win installation.
I downloaded and expanded the gnuPG 2.1.13 Windows CLI archive into a new
directory, and made sure to fully
Wowh, what a comprehensive answer... :)
THANKS!
> Furthermore, pipes do generally work on Windows.
> Wouldn't this work?
> gpg2\gpg2.exe --export | gpg14\gpg.exe --import
Similar pipes are working in Windows.
> gpg2\gpg2.exe --export-ownertrust >C:\temp\exported.trust
> gpg2\gpg2.exe --output
On 12 Feb 2016 at 9:35, gnupgpacker wrote:
> Wowh, what a comprehensive answer... :)
> THANKS!
>
> > Furthermore, pipes do generally work on Windows.
> > Wouldn't this work?
> > gpg2\gpg2.exe --export | gpg14\gpg.exe --import
>
> Similar pipes are working in Windows.
>
> > gpg2\gpg2.exe
On 12/02/16 10:28, Matthias Mansfeld wrote:
> Maybe it will become a bit more complicated if it is necessary to
> keep the keyrings syncronized in both directions.
Hehe :). Okay, I'll humour you :).
I'd probably extract all known keys from both installations, and
propagate deletions. You also
Hello,
> Matthias:
> Maybe it will become a bit more complicated if it is necessary to
> keep the keyrings syncronized in both directions. This will happen at
> least if you let GPGRelay "Learn aliases from POP3"
Switch off! ;)
Serious answer:
Latest known version of GPGrelay ist 0.962,
Thanks for hint!
> From: Peter Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com]
> Install GnuPG 1.4 alongside 2.1 and manually sync all keys from GnuPG
> 2.1 to 1.4, with for instance:
> $ gpg2 --export | gpg --import
I did get it running even on Windows:
gpg2\gpg2.exe --export --output
First of all... it was established in this thread that you could not
share the key store between GnuPG 2.1 and 1.4. Why is that the case? I
can happily do that here on Linux. The only gotcha is that you don't
profit from the speed gains GnuPG 2.1 gets from the new format of the
key store. Oh, and
Thanks for answer. It seems GPGrelay is not longer maintained by its
developers but is still working with a charme if gpg.exe 1.4x is used.
So, how to work around and supply keys to GPGrelay even if using gpg version
2 and up?
Regards, Chris
http://sites.inka.de/tesla/gpgrelay.html
On 21/12/15 11:33, gnupgpacker wrote:
> So, how to work around and supply keys to GPGrelay even if using gpg version
> 2 and up?
Install GnuPG 1.4 alongside 2.1 and manually sync all keys from GnuPG
2.1 to 1.4, with for instance:
$ gpg2 --export | gpg --import
I'm not sure how large the
Thanks for hint, that would be a distress way.
But it seems to be limited to v1.4x supported keys only.
What will happen, if v1.4x tries to import gpg-2.x keys with elevated
features?
Regards, Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
On Monday 21 December 2015 11:53:13 gnupgpacker wrote:
> Thanks for hint, that would be a distress way.
> But it seems to be limited to v1.4x supported keys only.
> What will happen, if v1.4x tries to import gpg-2.x keys with elevated
> features?
The features are part of GnuPG 2.x and not part of
On Sunday 20 December 2015 10:44:58 gnupgpacker wrote:
> But if using GPGrelay 0.9.6, while starting it displays attached error
> message. There seems to be a different key storing location or key format
> between 1.4x and 2.1x versions, isn't it?
This is not about the key format.
It appears
Hello,
I did install Gpg4win-3.0 beta (with gpg 2.1.10 included). All older pub/sec
keys are imported with Kleopatra, gpg encryption / decryption is working.
But if using GPGrelay 0.9.6, while starting it displays attached error
message. There seems to be a different key storing location or key
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:14, deepak.sax...@safenet-inc.com said:
I am trying to test file encryption with SafeNet smart cards. (CardOs/ Java
and other tokens).
I am getting error message: The card application is not yet supported.
You need to write an application which GnuPG knows about. The
Hi Yutaka,
I am trying to test file encryption with SafeNet smart cards. (CardOs/ Java and
other tokens).
I am getting error message: The card application is not yet supported.
I have dll libraries for my tokens but I am new to GPG4Win.
Can you please guide me the way to import the library
Hello,
I am Deepak Saxena from Gemalto (formerly SafeNet Inc) and I am curious if
smart cards are supported for storing the keys which will be used to encrypt
files or email using gpg4win.
I have installed gpg4win 2.2.3 and want to test SafeNet smart cards.
I am getting following error
Hello,
This is second time for me to receive the message like:
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by
Hello,
I am Deepak Saxena from Gemalto (formerly SafeNet Inc) and I am curious if
smart cards are supported for storing the keys which will be used to encrypt
files or email using gpg4win.
I have installed gpg4win 2.2.3 and want to test SafeNet smart cards.
I am getting following error
Hello,
if importing a public gpg rsa key to current Thunderbird/Enigmail/Gpg4Win on
Win7-64, there is an issue with German Umlaute, pls refer to attached
screenshot.
Exported key has been created by GPG-1.4.18/Win7-64, importing Enigmail
works with GPG4Win (GPG-2.0.26)/Win7-64.
Everything
You seen the news Gpg4win 2.2.3 is here. :)
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/gpg4win-announce/2014-November/62.html
and with 2.0.26.
So why not GnuPG 2.1?
Because 2.2.3 is a minor release that fixes important defects.
Before we can publish a GnuPG version with GnuPG 2.1 we would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/14 14:10, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/07/14 11:45,
da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Hi All,
In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and
pubring.gpg files
Hi David,
On Saturday 12 July 2014 09:02:09 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
htmlhead
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
/head
body bgcolor=#FF text=#00
br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-br
Hash: SHA1br
br
[snip]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-br
Version:
On 12/07/14 17:22, Ingo Kl�cker wrote:
Hi David,
On Saturday 12 July 2014 09:02:09 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
htmlhead
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
/head
body bgcolor=#FF text=#00
br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-br
Hash: SHA1br
br
[snip]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and pubring.gpg
files?
Thanks
David
- --
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body.
Nothing
On 11/07/14 11:45, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Hi All,
In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and pubring.gpg files?
In Windows 7, 64bit, these files are in
/Users/your_user_name/AppData/Roaming/gnupg/
regards,
Philip
0x23543A63.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:45 AM, da...@gbenet.com da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Hi All,
In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and pubring.gpg files?
In Windows 7 at least, it's in %appdata%\Roaming\gnupg
--
Pete Stephenson
___
Gnupg-users
Do you know of a maillist or a forum for gpg4win ?
I have problems to install.
Bernhard
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:38:12 +0200, Dr. Bernhard Kleine wrote:
Do you know of a maillist or a forum for gpg4win ?
I have problems to install.
There are mailing lists and support forums in English and German.
Eniglish ones are more active
Am using Gpg4win 2.2.1 /GnuPG 2.0.22
Did gpg --dump-options and noticed that the --faked-system-time option is not
listed.
Was this option removed?
vedaal
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:18, ndk.cla...@gmail.com said:
way to connect about anything to a computer. Emulated keyboard which
sends ANSI control codes to take over your box without you noticing?
Uh? Whithout you noticing? For sure you know more than me, but to my
knowledge an USB keyboard only
Hello,
On 23.10.2013 0:37, Martin Wolters wrote:
I am using gpg4win 2.2.1, which according to the change log supports
the SPR332 PIN-pad, but pinentry requests the PIN from the keyboard.
Is there anything I need to configure to enforce the entry from the
card reader?
I'm having the exact same
Hi,
I am using gpg4win 2.2.1, which according to the change log supports
the SPR332 PIN-pad, but pinentry requests the PIN from the keyboard.
Is there anything I need to configure to enforce the entry from the
card reader?
In GNU/Linux, pinentry only opens a window telling me to enter the PIN
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:19:10 +0200
NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 12/09/2013 23:10, Marko Randjelovic ha scritto:
All the time I read suggestions on using USB sticks and I must say
people are crazy about USB sticks. It is more convenient to use
optical media then USB stick because
Il 12/09/2013 23:10, Marko Randjelovic ha scritto:
All the time I read suggestions on using USB sticks and I must say
people are crazy about USB sticks. It is more convenient to use optical
media then USB stick because they are read only. Boot from Live CD, not
from USB stick and use USB
On 13/09/13 09:19, NdK wrote:
PS: I'll tell you a secret: there are USB keys with a write protect
switch :)
Since people were concerned about hacking the USB key, you need to define the
scenario.
First of all, if we are talking about hacking through a rogue firmware update
for the USB key: is
09/12/2013 22:03, NdK wrote:
You really should define your security perimeter.
09/13/2013 09:19, NdK wrote:
I can be reasonably sure nobody will hack my machine just to read my
mail. Obama can be reasonably sure that *many* attackers will try.
My security perimeter should be equal to the
On 09/10/13 21:42, Jan wrote:
10/9/2013 14:19, Werner Koch wrote :
So what about using that free USB stack for AVR's to implement a flash
device? You would be able to audit about everything; flylogic even has
these nice pictures of the ATmega88 masks...
10/9/2013 16:33, David Smith wrote:
In 09/13/2013 14:05, NdK wrote:
Some other approach might be to compare the output of several
versions of gnuPG, PGP etc.. This way you could check whether the
information was secretly decrypted with a second FBI key. This is
even
possible for someone how is no programer. Do you think
On 09/13/2013 14:05, NdK wrote:
What happens if one of your correspondents is willing to undergo the
whole procedure and he's an FBI agent?
I'd tell him confidential information, - but I did not intent to protect
me against such a thread by means of gnuPG.
If you want to
certify that your
Il 13/09/2013 21:12, Jan ha scritto:
How can you check there isn't a weakness in RNG, for exampel [...]
There are statistical test with which you can test whether a random
number generator produces for instance uniformly distributed numbers.
This in connection with the above procedure might
Il 11/09/2013 11:48, Pete Stephenson ha scritto:
Actually, I was thinking of something that was the exact opposite:
some device (which I don't think exists) that would allow one to
connect a USB flash drive to the device, and have the device convert
that into RS232 serial data for the
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Why trust gpg4win?
Il 11/09/2013 11:48, Pete Stephenson ha scritto:
Actually, I was thinking of something that was the exact opposite:
some device (which I don't think exists) that would allow one to
connect a USB flash
On 12/09/13 15:55, Jan wrote:
Do you see any reasonable attack vectors? What do you think?
The moment someone plugs in a mass storage device and we're talking about
attacking his computer, I think of a manipulated file system, exploiting an
error in the file system driver of the kernel (which
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:55:24 +0200
Jan takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
2.1 Most people have only one PC and windows as operating system, so
the linux/unix distribution should be installed on an USB device.
This device must not be plugged into the PC if windows is running, in
order to avoid a
On 10/09/2013 15:18, NdK wrote:
You'd be exposed nearly to the same attack vectors. Plus some more (the
ones that handle the extra layer), so you'd have to check more code.
So what about using that free USB stack for AVR's to implement a flash
device? You would be able to audit about
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jan takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
On 10/09/2013 15:18, NdK wrote:
You'd be exposed nearly to the same attack vectors. Plus some more (the
ones that handle the extra layer), so you'd have to check more code.
So what about using that free USB stack for AVR's to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:50, ndk.cla...@gmail.com said:
First error: USB is *not* a peer protocol. It's master-slave. FireWire
is a peer protocol.
However, that is implemented by computers at boths ends and the software
there may have backdoors or explotable code which coult be used for all
kind
On 10/9/2013 14:19, Werner Koch wrote :
However, [USB] is implemented by computers at boths ends and the software
there may have backdoors or explotable code which coult be used for all
kind of tricks [...]
I am shocked! Why was USB constructed that insecure?!
On 10/9/2013 14:19, Werner Koch
On 09/10/13 15:16, Jan wrote:
I don't understand this, what does AVR etc. mean? Is there a substituion for
USB? I'd be grateful for an explanation.
AVR is a semiconductor manufacturer who make microcontrollers (amongst
other things).
___
Gnupg-users
10/9/2013 14:19, Werner Koch wrote :
So what about using that free USB stack for AVR's to implement a flash
device? You would be able to audit about everything; flylogic even has
these nice pictures of the ATmega88 masks...
10/9/2013 16:33, David Smith wrote:
AVR is a semiconductor
On 9/9/2013 4:52 PM, Jan wrote:
Imagine an intact offline PC without auto play enabled for USB drives.
Can't.
USB is a peer protocol. There's an astonishing amount of computational
power on both sides of that USB cable. Protocol negotiation is complex.
Put it all together and you get a
On 08/25/2013 07:39 AM, Larry Brower wrote:
BSD might have too high a learning curve for most ordinary people. A
custom BSD distro targeted at non-technical people would be useful here.
Perhaps one which took Security and Privacy into account as design goal.
http://www.pcbsd.org/
On 08/22/2013 11:22 AM, Jasper den Ouden wrote:
Compiling your own fixes the issue of the sources not corresponding
to binaries.
Only if you're sophisticated enough to be able to understand the
compiler itself, all of the libraries that are linked in, etc. etc. Even
in open source software
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:39, faramir...@gmail.com said:
Nice! But... is the stable version different than Gpg4win
2.2.0-beta56 ? Sometimes the final version of a product is the same as
the last beta.
Yes. Here are the commits since beta56:
305eb8e3 * gpg4win-2.2.0 origin/master origin/HEAD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 21-08-2013 8:53, Emanuel Schütze escribió:
Hello,
we are pleased to announce the availability of the new stable
Gpg4win version 2.2.0.
Nice! But... is the stable version different than Gpg4win
2.2.0-beta56 ? Sometimes the final version
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Jan takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
It seems quite easy to advice people to have an offline windows PC with
gpg4win on it and all their private stuff and a windows(?) online PC next to
it. They could transfer encrypted messages with an USB stick from one PC
Hello Pete !
Pete Stephenson p...@heypete.com wrote:
The easiest and least-expensive solution to this situation is using
smartcards: http://g10code.com/p-card.html -- the private key is kept
securely on the smartcard. Any private-key operations (i.e. signing or
decrypting) are handled
- Original Message -
From: Jasper den Ouden o.jas...@gmail.com
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Why trust gpg4win?
As others noted, endpoints are too often insecure. Arent computers
getting much cheaper now, as shown by say, the raspberry
On 08/24/2013 11:34 PM, mirimir wrote:
Small flash cards are cheap enough to use once and then destroy.
This doesn't resolve the problem of the device being compromised as soon
as it is plugged into a compromised system. There is a lot of malware
that will copy itself to any disk that gets
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jan takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
Can you recommend such an operating system? Your idea seems practicable and
convenient to me.
Would users have to refrain from flash videos?
I would suggest OpenBSD for that. If BSD is to exotic, then Debian Stable.
Flas is known
On 08/25/2013 08:24 AM, Josef Schneider wrote:
I would suggest OpenBSD for that. If BSD is to exotic, then Debian Stable.
Flas is known to have more security holes than one can count, so I
would stay very far away from it!
BSD might have too high a learning curve for most ordinary people. A
On 08/25/2013 02:09 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
On 08/24/2013 11:34 PM, mirimir wrote:
Small flash cards are cheap enough to use once and then destroy.
This doesn't resolve the problem of the device being compromised as soon
as it is plugged into a compromised system. There is a lot of malware
provide a way of secure communication for
the majority of the people? This is what I want, since many of my friends
are no computer experts and will never be.
It seems quite easy to advice people to have an offline windows PC with
gpg4win on it and all their private stuff and a windows(?) online PC
learning curve, and people will overwhelmingly choose the former.
We cannot make people care. That's one of the hardest truths I've had
to accept.
It seems quite easy to advice people to have an offline windows PC
with gpg4win on it and all their private stuff and a windows(?)
online PC next
On 08/25/2013 04:04 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 8/24/2013 5:14 PM, Jan wrote:
SNIP
It seems quite easy to advice people to have an offline windows PC
with gpg4win on it and all their private stuff and a windows(?)
online PC next to it. They could transfer encrypted messages with an
USB
On 07/26/13 22:20, Johan Wevers wrote:
Yes, I know the mantra, and I'm sure that obvious backdoors are not
present because they would be found rather quickly. However, more subtle
bugs leading to decipherable messages can take more time to find. The
infamous PRNG bug in pgp 5 on Unix is a
On 23-08-2013 10:37, David Smith wrote:
Yes, I know the mantra, and I'm sure that obvious backdoors are not
present because they would be found rather quickly. However, more subtle
bugs leading to decipherable messages can take more time to find. The
infamous PRNG bug in pgp 5 on Unix is a
Hi Jan
you can try this one: http://goldbug.sourceforge.net/
which is available in version 02.
It has OpenSSL and gpg method, so additional layers of security.
Regards
2013/7/25 takethe...@gmx.de
Hi everybody,
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt
On 08/23/2013 01:09 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
you can try this one: http://goldbug.sourceforge.net/
which is available in version 02.
It seems disingenuous to say, well, GnuPG says they have no connections
to the BSI but if you're concerned about that then try my crypto product
because I have no
The solution of course is as you urged takethe...@gmx.de , to get a
free operating system such as Linux or BSD, complete with free
build tools compile your own (even non programmers can do that,
eg on an OS downloaded from http://www.freebsd.org
Compiling your own fixes the issue of the
is also getting larger all the time making study of the assembler
code more difficult.
If you ask me, gpg4win was ready for prime time a long time ago.
I haven't finished it but here it is:
http://www.securemecca.com/public/GnuPG/
http://www.securemecca.com/public/GnuPG/TrustOfGPG4Win-2.txt
If you
and not less secure than if I would build it, send it to
them for code signing, receiving it back and OpenPGP sign the exe files.
BYW, only about 10% of the Gpg4win downloaders also download the .sig
file.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:14:08AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi, Reference:
From: atair atai...@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:17:43 +
atair wrote:
...
Therefore, changes that look like
back doors are VERY unlikely to find their way in a
Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:14:08AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi, Reference:
From: atair atai...@googlemail.com=20
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:17:43 +=20
=20
atair wrote:
...
Therefore, changes that look like
back doors are VERY
. Despite that I agree with Werner Koch who wrote here
http://rem.eifzilla.de/archives/2013/07/16/gpg4win-and-the-feds
that it is impossible for a single person to check the entire code that runs
on a PC, even if it is open source. Especially this is not possible for the
average user, since he
On 25-07-2013 23:17, atair wrote:
This basically means, that everyone(!) can access, modify and
redistribute the source code of the program (see [2] if you're
interested). There are lots of people (usually volunteers from all
over the wold) who do peer reviews on the sources (and if you start
On Jul 26, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Jan takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
Still I wonder whether there are many sources for SHA1 sums of
gpg4win, that could be used by a windows user to test the integrity
of his download (C't ?). Are the SHA1 sums of gpg4win presented on
the download site checked
, not realizing the damage that it would
do. Here is the pointer to the ACM delivery. You need to
understand that they were talking about GnuPG running on a VM
(Virtual Machine) in the cloud:
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2382230
That is nothing close to what GPG4Win is doing running natively
Hi everybody,
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally, why
should I trust gunpg? I'm a windows user.
Thanks for any answers
On 7/25/13, takethe...@gmx.de takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi everybody,
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally, why
should I
Hi, Reference:
From: atair atai...@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:17:43 +
atair wrote:
...
Therefore, changes that look like
back doors are VERY unlikely to find their way in a release, because
hundreds of people are looking how the software evolves and will
On 7/25/2013 3:34 PM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
why should I trust gpg4win?
It's been years -- 25 years or more -- since I've read Victor Milan's
The Cybernetic Samurai. I only remember one scene from the novel, but
it's a scene of such vividness that it's been permanently burned into my
brain
Am Do 25.07.2013, 18:31:17 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
Why should you trust GPG4WIN? Beats me. That's on you.
No. That is a question that can easily be answered by the public (in both
directions) and already has been answered here. Not the why is up to him but
the final whether
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:34, takethe...@gmx.de said:
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally,
If you are interested in my take
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt f?r Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally, why
should I trust gunpg? I'm a windows
On 07/25/2013 07:34 PM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi everybody,
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally, why
should I trust
On 7/25/2013 3:34 PM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), which has
close connections to secret services. Is gunPT any better? Finally, why
should I trust gunpg? I'm a windows
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:28, bernh...@intevation.de said:
What is the rational for the default setting of the putty support,
which seems to be off?
- The same is done under Unix for ssh
- After the installation of a new Gpg4win version an also installed
Pageant won't work anymore if gpg-agent
On Wednesday 03 July 2013 at 19:25:00, Werner Koch wrote:
(gpg-agent --enable-putty-support --daemon)
What is the rational for the default setting of the putty support, which seems
to be off?
--
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO)www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
I need to check how to access the default browser. It uses the class ID
of InternetExplorer.Application to lookup IWebBrowser2.
Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:38, jo...@netpage.dk said:
Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
I do this way in GpgOL. However Marcus decided for soemthing different
in GpgEX. I have a dark recollection that this was due to problems with
Explorer plugins.
The problem
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
Hi!
I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
Windows 64 bit. This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg4win, you
may want
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:09, jo...@netpage.dk said:
Hi, I tried all of the possible functions work.
Thanks.
The only problem I found is, that help asks for Admin rights. And if
the rights are granted, it starts Internet Explorer, not the default
browser!
I need to check how to access the
On 02/05/13 02:51, 儒風管理部-潘右文 wrote:
I believe I downloaded this version gpg4win-1.1.4.exe17-Feb-2009
17:46
9.5M . It is a little bit old but I have a hard time to install newer
version on my windows XP SP3. It simplely doesn’t work on my windows XP. I
googled it . Some people said
On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:29, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
Are the developers aware of a bug preventing use of recent gpg4win on a
Chinese
Windows XP system? At a glance, it would appear to be something that
Yeah, there is a KDE problem. AFAIK, GPA works fine.
This issue should be resolved
of a file is just a bonus. But there are times you need
to see the entire file name not to get all fouled up.
This is one of those times.
Right click on the testsig.bat file and from the GPG4Win
menu make a detached signature file of the testsig.bat file.
The detached signature
On 21/05/13 20:53, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
Double click on the testsig.bat file on XP (you may need to
do a runas on Windows Vista (horrors) or Windows 7 (better).
This file looks just fine to me, but in general I'd caution anyone not to run
commands they do not understand just because
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, MFPA expires2...@ymail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 15 April 2013 at 2:54:19 AM, in
mid:pine.neb.4.64.1304142149510.15...@panix3.panix.com, Jay
Sulzberger wrote:
What telephone number, what email address should I use
to
This whole thread is wildly off topic for this list. Can people please
stop replying to it?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
101 - 200 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
