-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 8 November 2013 at 12:00:56 PM, in
mid:87zjpfxfuv@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
It
seems to me that the BAT does not support Comodo CA.
Uwe
Aside from the ones I have added, The Bat has about 120 root CA
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
[snip]
However thunderbird refuses to use yoru public key
claiming it cannot be trusted.
I just searched and found [1] about Thunderbird, which says you can
import a
(Before I begin I should say I agree with Mark -- this is commentary,
not disagreement.)
This bug seems to cry out for an add-on. Then people who (think they)
know what they are doing can have the additional convenience, and the
rest can do whatever it is they do now. I would guess there is
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
On Thursday 7 November 2013 at 11:16:36 AM, in
mid:87txfotqaz@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I had to search for and import some more root certificates from the
Comodo website before I could encrypt to you using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 7 November 2013 at 11:16:36 AM, in
mid:87txfotqaz@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
BTW, I see you switched back to pgp, but why do you use
old inline mode and not pgpmine?
Because I prefer it. I like to see the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 7 November 2013 at 11:16:36 AM, in
mid:87txfotqaz@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
However it is not necessary I just export our signature
as a pem file and import in under authorities. Still
this is very
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
Hi
On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
mid:87habrrdnk@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
- from my own experience I am convinced that smime
is much easierthan gpg[2] for reasons I am not
going to repeat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 11:42:49 AM, in
mid:87txfpg3ie@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Well take for example iOs: using pgp is a sort of a
nightmare.
So I have heard.
The reasons why I think smime is easier to
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hello
There are already several private sector CAs who provide free S/MIME
certificates in the hope that punters may take one of their paid
products instead or in addition. Potential sales is their incentive to
provide some products
Hi
On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
mid:87habrrdnk@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
- NSA (among others) has abused its resource to
read emailworldwide at a very large scale.
Indeed.
- so if a lot of people, say 30 % of all users
would encrypt their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 2 November 2013 at 6:48:39 PM, in
mid:87fvreprlk@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Your point being?
I presume it goes like this: NSA is a government
based organisation doing, among other things,
violations of civil rights.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 3 November 2013 at 10:02:14 PM, in
mid:87habtnnyx@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Ingo == Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org writes:
So, your point/hope probably was that a government
based CA wouldn't have such a business
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 4 November 2013 at 2:02:30 PM, in
mid:563460450.20131104140230@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Where actual identity is not required, just continuity
of communication, I see no value in obtaining any
certification at all.
Or, indeed,
Ingo == Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org writes:
I interpreted especially because of all which was lately revealed about
the NSA
No it was more of a general remark, concerning NSA malpractice of
reading everybody's (uncrypted) email unconditionally.
So, your point/hope probably was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 1 November 2013 at 7:25:30 PM, in
mid:20131101122530.horde.l0bejumqv5vfmfmqhbr7...@mail.sixdemonbag.org,
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
But since some of
my RD funding comes from the government, I'm just as
nefarious as the NSA.
[...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 1 November 2013 at 6:47:56 PM, in
mid:20131101114756.horde.f5rbb0pjwmqx-chco0km...@mail.sixdemonbag.org,
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation?
Surely guilt-by-association renders every government
I wish to extend my sincere and unreserved apologies to all the people
I unintentionally offended.
Thank you for this. (Seriously.)
There's an American movie that probably hasn't been seen much in Europe.
_High Noon_, starring Gary Cooper, which may be the finest Western ever
made. In a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 2 November 2013 at 2:36:27 PM, in
mid:52750deb.6090...@sixdemonbag.org, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
They are not practicing guilt by suspicion. They are
practicing, hey, let's collect as much information as
possible on this crime
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
On Sunday 27 October 2013 at 2:46:05 PM, in
mid:8761si4vrm@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation? Surely
guilt-by-association renders every government based organisation just
as
On 02/11/13 19:48, Uwe Brauer wrote:
So either you claim to have evidence that this modules have been hacked
and the key pair is transferred to some of these evil organisations or I
really don't see your point.
I think the most common way for an X.509 CA to be deceitful is by giving someone
On 02.11.2013 20:20, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 02/11/13 19:48, Uwe Brauer wrote:
So either you claim to have evidence that this modules have been hacked
and the key pair is transferred to some of these evil organisations or I
really don't see your point.
I think the most common way for an
On Saturday 02 November 2013 19:48:39 Uwe Brauer wrote:
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
On Sunday 27 October 2013 at 2:46:05 PM, in
mid:8761si4vrm@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation? Surely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 27 October 2013 at 2:46:05 PM, in
mid:8761si4vrm@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I would prefer a government based organisation which
provides this service to its citizen (especially
because of all which was lately revealed
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation? Surely
guilt-by-association renders every government based organisation just
as nefarious as the NSA.
This is why grown-ups don't believe in guilt by association.
To take an example: the graduate students at the University of Iowa
who teach
My previous email was pretty dry and impersonal. This one is very personal.
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation? Surely
guilt-by-association renders every government based organisation just
as nefarious as the NSA.
My current job is in software forensics -- discovering new ways to
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:03, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
know by the date of the certificate which certificate to use for which
message?
- old for old messages
Note, that there is no need for a certificate for decryption - only the
private key is required. The certificate is only used to show
Werner == Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org writes:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:03, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
know by the date of the certificate which certificate to use for which
message?
- old for old messages
Note, that there is no need for a certificate for decryption - only the
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
Werner == Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org writes:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:03, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
know by the date of the certificate which certificate to use for which
message?
- old for old messages
If you generate a new keypair for the new certificate (which is
probably a good idea) then gpgsm (and presumably any other
certificate-using software) will figure out what private key will be
needed to decrypt a particular message and, so long as you still have
the private key
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
If you generate a new keypair for the new certificate (which is
probably a good idea) then gpgsm (and presumably any other
certificate-using software) will figure out what private key will be
needed to decrypt
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:23, p...@heypete.com said:
Correct, though it is possible (but usually recommend against) to
create a new certificate using the same private keypair as before. In
The business model of most CAs is to sell you a subscription by setting
the expiration time very low so that
Werner == Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org writes:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:23, p...@heypete.com said:
Correct, though it is possible (but usually recommend against) to
create a new certificate using the same private keypair as before. In
The business model of most CAs is to sell you a
Hello
I use gpgsm, via gnus+Xemacs and I have installed a free certificate
from Comodo. This certificate expires in a couple of weeks and I have to
apply for a new one. However I need the old one to read old messages.
Can gpgsm deal with this situation?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:02, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
Can gpgsm deal with this situation?
Sure. That is a very common situation.
Although I am myself not using gpgsm for mail encryption, I use it to
maintain all kind of X.509 certificates. FWIW, gpgsm passed several
conformance tests with quite
Werner == Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org writes:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:02, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
Can gpgsm deal with this situation?
Sure. That is a very common situation.
Although I am myself not using gpgsm for mail encryption, I use it to
maintain all kind of X.509
35 matches
Mail list logo
