On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:45:17PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
IMO, if your client is showing correct PGP/MIME signatures on this list,
you should file a defect report about your client. The message has been
changed in transit and is no longer in the exact same state as it was
when the
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:45:17 -0400
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
Hello Robert,
IMO, if your client is showing correct PGP/MIME signatures on this list,
you should file a defect report about your client.
It certainly warrants investigation. I'll check bug tracker and ML
archives
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 28.06.2012 18:55, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:24:32 +0300 Mika Suomalainen
mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
Were you able to verify that signature?
Several people use PGP/MIME, all of which verify here,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.06.2012 21:50, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 28/06/12 17:24, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Were you able to verify that signature?
I don't believe my Enigmail is willing to check any PGP/MIME
signatures for me... must be something broken with the
On 27.06.2012 18:33, Peter Lebbing wrote:
For future reference, that URL is in the headers of every mail you get from
the
list, btw.
--
[Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) ||
NOTICE! I am on mobile broadband with very limited time, so I cannot
read emails very much.
The best
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:31:09 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
If you ask on Enigmail mailing list, they will tell you that that
issue is with Mailman (or other mailing list software) which messes up
with headers and makes PGP/MIME unverifiable. They will
On 06/29/2012 08:06 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
If you ask on Enigmail mailing list, they will tell you that that
issue is with Mailman (or other mailing list software) which messes up
with headers and makes PGP/MIME unverifiable. They will also say that
Headers are outside what is signed,
Hey all,
not meaning to spark up new discussions about this issue (we've had that
before). But I really think, the energy invested in this discussion would be
better invested in writing mailman tweaks.
Also, someone mentioned, that there already in fact *is* a mailman patch for
PGP/MIME to
Oh dear. I found it. The bug has been reported 2003:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/265961
I wish I had better coding skills, but I don't. Sorry I can't code the fix...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:00:03 +0200
Steve st...@gpgtools.org wrote:
Hello Steve,
not meaning to spark up new discussions about this issue (we've had
that before). But I really think, the energy invested in this
It was not my intention to open old wounds as it were. I was curious
about Mika's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
29.06.2012 15:06, Brad Rogers kirjoitti:
Headers are outside what is signed, surely?
Changing, adding or removing headers should have no bearing on the
validity of PGP signatures. If header changes were involved,
nothing would be verifiable,
On 06/29/2012 12:00 PM, Steve wrote:
not meaning to spark up new discussions about this issue (we've had that
before). But I really think, the energy invested in this discussion
would be better invested in writing mailman tweaks.
In the language of software engineering, this has moved from a
On 06/29/2012 12:26 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
Seems okay here; Most messages check out, be they inline or MIME
signed.
IMO, if your client is showing correct PGP/MIME signatures on this list,
you should file a defect report about your client. The message has been
changed in transit and is no
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:02:57 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
I am using GMail as headers probably say if you look at them.
The form address is hotmail. Message ID is hotmail, too. gmail *is*
mentioned, but not in any of the transport headers. Anyhow,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:48:28 -0400
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
Hello Robert,
Mika is more or less right, except it isn't headers -- it's the PGP/MIME
attachment separator. Mailman makes a very slight tweak and that's
That makes more sense. I thought I must have been going
On 06/29/2012 12:02 PM, Steve wrote:
Oh dear. I found it. The bug has been reported
2003: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/265961
That bug turned out to be in Enigmail, not Mailman. Mailman was
repackaging the attachment in a way that was technically valid but which
Enigmail wasn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27.06.2012 18:33, Peter Lebbing wrote:
For future reference, that URL is in the headers of every mail you
get from the list, btw.
I think that it's not on those, which are PGP/MIME signed.
- --
[Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) ||
@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking
Message-ID: 20120627161446.058c6...@abydos.stargate.org.uk
In-Reply-To: 20120627143030.99d05e6...@smtp.hushmail.com
References: 20120627143030.99d05e6...@smtp.hushmail.com
[...]
List-Id: Help and discussion among users of GnuPG gnupg
: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:14:46 +0100 From: Brad Rogers
b...@fineby.me.uk To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re:
ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking Message-ID:
20120627161446.058c6...@abydos.stargate.org.uk In-Reply-To:
20120627143030.99d05e6...@smtp.hushmail.com References:
20120627143030.99d05e6
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:24:32 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
Were you able to verify that signature?
Several people use PGP/MIME, all of which verify here, and include the
list headers you seem to be saying get removed. Not only on this list,
but many
On 28/06/12 17:24, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Were you able to verify that signature?
I don't believe my Enigmail is willing to check any PGP/MIME signatures for
me... must be something broken with the installation. I don't really pay
attention to signatures on this mailing list, and this is the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:33:38 -0400 Aaron Toponce
aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:12, aaron.topo...@gmail.com said:
So, if Thus, the reason I began with 'if'. :)
Am using Hushmail (have been using it since
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:30:30 -0400
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
Hello ved...@nym.hush.com,
Unfortunately, as you suspected, the message I'm replying to did break
threading. It's Hushmail that's at fault, I believe.
does it require unsubscribing and re-subscribing,
or is there an easier way?
On 27/06/12 16:30, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
btw,
how do I change from 'digest-mode' to 'individual-list mode'?
Go to http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/options/gnupg-users, enter your e-mail
address and password you subscribed with, and you get an interface where you can
change such settings.
On 27/06/12 17:14, Brad Rogers wrote:
Sadly, with mailman, unsubbing and resubbing is the only way for a
regular user to change their subscription format.
Having switched from digest to individual message mode myself about a year ago,
I can tell you you are mistaken. I did it succesfully in the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:34:02 -0400 Peter Lebbing
pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
and you get an interface where you can change such settings.
ok
changed to individual digest mode, and replying directly
(hushmail default of 'reply' is to individual user and cc to list)
hope it works,
if not,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
ok
changed to individual digest mode, and replying directly
(hushmail default of 'reply' is to individual user and cc to list)
hope it works,
if not, any other suggestions to try in hushmail?
TIA
vedaal
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:54:16 +0100
From: Andy Ruddock andy.rudd...@rainydayz.org
I just set up a free hushmail account, using the web interface you
don't
get an In-Reply-To field in the header.
I couldn't find any settings which would enable this.
So, if you're using a free hushmail account
28 matches
Mail list logo
