Hi,
I'm trying to figure out what the influence is of the different
signature types (0x10-0x13). As far as I can tell, they only _indicate_
the signers trust in his own sig, but isn't used in any way by GPG. Is
this correct?
I was hoping it would be used in the trust model, but apparently only
I'm trying to figure out what the influence is of the different
signature types (0x10-0x13).
From the gpg2 man page:
--min-cert-level
When building the trust database, treat any signatures with a
certification level
below this as invalid. Defaults to 2, which
On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:12 AM, Niels Laukens ni...@dest-unreach.be wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out what the influence is of the different
signature types (0x10-0x13). As far as I can tell, they only _indicate_
the signers trust in his own sig, but isn't used in any way by GPG. Is
this
On 2013-02-07 17:25, David Shaw wrote:
Nope, this could be done. There are a few reasons it hasn't,
including that it would make the trust model incompatible (in the
sense that a path that exists using GnuPG might not exist in PGP and
vice versa) with other implementations.
There is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-02-07 17:54, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I think anyone interested in improving the trust model should
probably try to think through how to make an improved user
interface for people who are trying to inspect the trust model.
I use
