I passed an interesting Sunday afternoon : removed gnupg2.0.26 and attempted to
replace it with gnupg-2.1.2. The experience was not entirely successful.
I got the updated libraries installed using configure/make/checkinstall. I used
checkinstall because various howto articles on ubuntu's wiki
On Wed 2015-02-11 16:35:27 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
If I do gpg2 --version, it comes back clearly with 2.0.26. and enigmail
clearly
indicates that it has found the gpg2 that I built.
So, moving on, if I do :
apt-get -t experimental install gnupg2
will I get 2.1.1 installed together
Hi, Philip,
Am 11.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Philip Jackson:
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
[snip]
When I try your way from the command line, I get :
$ apt-cache policy gnupg2
Hi Stephan,
On 12/02/15 22:46, Stephan Beck wrote:
Hi, Philip,
Am 11.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Philip Jackson:
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
[snip]
In synaptic: have you set
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow the
instructions at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental
Thank you for that suggestion, Brian. I looked into the link you provided and
decided that to see the precise name of
On 11/02/15 16:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I find that distro packages (for Ubuntu) lag well behind what is
available and I do appreciate that there is a trade-off between
proven reliability and up-to-dateness and also that distros rely on
maintainers who may well be volunteers...
If your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow
the instructions at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: OpenKeychain v3.1.2
I find that distro packages (for Ubuntu) lag well behind what is
available and I do appreciate that there is a trade-off between
proven reliability and up-to-dateness and also that distros rely on
maintainers who may well be volunteers...
If your goal is to enjoy tinkering with technology, by
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow
the
instructions at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental
snip...
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow
the
instructions at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental
Thank you for that suggestion, Brian. I looked into the
A priori, this doesn't seem very transparent but I suppose there must
be a way to determine if 2.0.22 is original or augmented ?
Yep, but as I'm not much of an Ubuntu guy I'll let one of them give you
specific instructions -- I just know Ubuntu, like Debian (which it's
built on), is very good
On 10/02/15 23:53, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The questions you're asking are very much the sort of thing that
distributions are designed to address.
What distro are you using? what version? 2.1.1 has been packaged for
some distros already (as have some of these dependencies), and you
I've been a linux user for less than a year and the only configure/make/install
I've done is for 2.0.26 and its dependencies (when I couldn't get the distro
supplied package 2.0.22 to work).
Now when I look at the dependencies for gnupg 2.1.1, I see that I need to
upgrade libassuan to 2.2.0,
On Tue 2015-02-10 14:09:59 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
I've been a linux user for less than a year and the only
configure/make/install
I've done is for 2.0.26 and its dependencies (when I couldn't get the distro
supplied package 2.0.22 to work).
Now when I look at the dependencies for
14 matches
Mail list logo
