On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 21:11, gn...@lists.grepular.com said:
open for about a year. APG hasn't had much work done on it for a while
so I'm not confident it will be addressed any time soon:
https://code.google.com/p/android-privacy-guard/issues/detail?id=104
The guardianproject.info is working on
On Apr 9, 2012 8:57 PM, John Clizbe j...@enigmail.net wrote:
John Gill wrote:
I know that gpg chooses common algos between the sender and recipient.
(I've not tested what will happen with recipients who have no
preferences in common with my enabled algos, but that's a problem for a
new
On Apr 6, 2012 12:15 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:32, john.g...@computer.org said:
I am feeding the output of a list-packets for my keying into an awk
script
to build a report on the keys and the preferences for each key.
You wrongly assume that signatures
On 4/10/12 10:09 AM, John Gill wrote:
You wrongly assume that signatures are valid. --list-packets does not
tell you this.
Could you help me understand what you are referring to?
I am, of course, not Werner, but let's see if I can't take a stab at it.
All --list-packets does is take the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/12 20:11, gn...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
What about fixing APG?
This would be the best option of course. There's been a bug report
open for about a year. APG hasn't had much work done on it for a
while so I'm not confident it will be
I am, of course, not Werner, but let's see if I can't take a stab at it.
All --list-packets does is take the input, in a human-unreadable format,
and transform it into a human-readable format. It performs none of the
computationally expensive mathematics that are required to validate the
I inadvertently sent an email to these lists a bit ago from my work
email account rather than my home one. My apologies to all who were
confused by the new email address. I was writing in a personal
capacity, not a professional one.
Since some of these lists reject and/or hold-for-moderation
