Hello,
I would like to know if when I send an encrypted and signed message the
signature is also encrypted or not ?
Thank you.
HardKor
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
I would like to know if when I send an encrypted and signed message the
signature is also encrypted or not ?
You can find out yourself whether GnuPG encrypts the signature. I did the
following:
$ echo Hoi|gpg2 -o bla.gpg -r de500b3e -se
$ gpg2 --list-packets --list-only bla.gpg
On Nov 5, 2012, at 4:57 AM, HardKor hardkor.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if when I send an encrypted and signed message the
signature is also encrypted or not ?
It is. You can manually construct other arrangements if you so desire, but the
built in --sign --encrypt
Am Mo 05.11.2012, 09:39:52 schrieb David Shaw:
I would like to know if when I send an encrypted and signed message the
signature is also encrypted or not ?
It is. You can manually construct other arrangements if you so desire,
But not for the (MUA integrated) use with email, can you?
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
Am Mo 05.11.2012, 09:39:52 schrieb David Shaw:
I would like to know if when I send an encrypted and signed message the
signature is also encrypted or not ?
It is. You can manually construct other arrangements if
On 11/04/2012 10:46 PM, Casey Marshall wrote:
I’d like to share Hockeypuck, an OpenPGP Keyserver I’ve developed in
Go (http://golang.org).
Cool, i'm glad to hear of it. Does this sync with any of the existing
SKS network? I saw no mention of peer synchronization in the README or
the project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This is an incomplete list, but what I like about GPGShell is
the following:
GPA does not work for me--it just crashes.
GPGShell has a number of components:
GPGTools for encrypting/decrypting files, GPGKeys which is the
keymanager to which GPA is
Am Mo 05.11.2012, 10:01:02 schrieb David Shaw:
Virtually always you *want* your signature to be encrypted.
Why? What critical information is exposed by the signature, assuming I do not
forge the from address?
Why would you want something else?
The virus-checking mail gateway may want to at
On 05-11-2012 16:29, Hauke Laging wrote:
I don't understand why PGP/MIME
does not define a seperate signature for the relevant sender created headers
(from, to, subject, date). That would protect the headers and allow filters
to
check the sender without exposing the data signature.
That
On 05/11/12 16:29, Hauke Laging wrote:
Why? What critical information is exposed by the signature, assuming I do not
forge the from address?
You're constricting your view too much to just e-mail in your analysis. If you
look at files stored on someone's hard drive, you don't have a from
On Nov 5, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
Am Mo 05.11.2012, 10:01:02 schrieb David Shaw:
Virtually always you *want* your signature to be encrypted.
Why? What critical information is exposed by the signature, assuming I do not
forge the from address?
On 2012-11-05 15:10, Avi wrote:
This is an incomplete list, but what I like about GPGShell is
the following:
I'd just like to say: *Thank you* for your constructive contribution.
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you
Am Mo 05.11.2012, 16:47:40 schrieb Johan Wevers:
On 05-11-2012 16:29, Hauke Laging wrote:
I don't understand why PGP/MIME
does not define a seperate signature for the relevant sender created
headers (from, to, subject, date). That would protect the headers and
allow filters to check the
On Monday, November 05, 2012 at 9:44 AM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com
wrote:
the built in --sign --encrypt in GPG is:
encrypt ( compress ( sign ( data ) ) )
=
Then, is there any way to tell if it is signed or not, without decrypting it?
(other than the fact that the signed and
On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:44 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
On Monday, November 05, 2012 at 9:44 AM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com
wrote:
the built in --sign --encrypt in GPG is:
encrypt ( compress ( sign ( data ) ) )
=
Then, is there any way to tell if it is signed or not,
On 05-11-2012 17:31, Hauke Laging wrote:
Given the amount of problems that can arise from spam and malware I am
surprised that the Western governments seem not to do anything about securing
this meanwhile critical infrastructure.
They try, but if I must choose between a strictly
On 11/05/2012 04:04 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 11/04/2012 10:46 PM, Casey Marshall wrote:
I’d like to share Hockeypuck, an OpenPGP Keyserver I’ve developed in
Go (http://golang.org).
Cool, i'm glad to hear of it. Does this sync with any of the existing
SKS network? I saw no mention
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 30-10-2012 9:31, Werner Koch escribió:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:41, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Could you perhaps make a list of, say, the top five features
GPGshell supports that GPA doesn't? Things that you, yourself,
use regularly,
That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 5 November 2012 at 8:22:07 PM, in
mid:50981fef.6040...@gmail.com, Faramir wrote:
I have 2 questions:
1.- Is it me, or gpg4win site is down?
http://gpg4win.org/ is working for me at the moment. I wasn't trying
an hour ago. (-;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 4 November 2012 at 4:45:05 PM, in
mid:87ehk92u7i@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote:
No, it is in 0.9.3 which was released after the last
Gpg4win beta.
Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for a windows binary.
- --
Best regards
20 matches
Mail list logo
