On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:59, Schultschik, Sven said:
> I looked now for days at the code and didn't saw this trivial fault. The
> Nullpoint check for the outstream was missing.
valgrind is your best friend in such cases.
> But a null point check for gpgme wouldn't be a bad idea. This way it
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:31, Стефан Васильев said:
> I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum Cryptography
> support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win,
I can't tell you that. I do not have anymore information than you.
From reading the tender it is
Hello Werner and all,
I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum Cryptography
support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win,
in the first place?
Text in German language:
https://www.evergabe-online.de/tenderdetails.html?5=397181
As understood, Germany
Am Dienstag 29 Juni 2021 14:44:39 schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev via
Gnupg-users:
> With this change, they are replacing PGP with ed25519, but everything else
> remains pretty much the same
But OpenPGP so much more than one algorithm,
you can even use ed25519 with OpenPGP today.
(Again, probably
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 05:53:53PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Dienstag 29 Juni 2021 14:44:39 schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev via
> Gnupg-users:
> > With this change, they are replacing PGP with ed25519, but everything else
> > remains pretty much the same
>
> But OpenPGP so much more than
Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:31, Стефан Васильев said:
I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum
Cryptography
support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win,
I can't tell you that. I do not have anymore information than you.
From
Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2021 18:56:15 schrieb Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users:
> maybe interesting for some of you.
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign
This does not have references on the problems it is claiming to address.
No description of the context where it is supposed to be used
Hi,
On Montag, 28. Juni 2021 21:37:58 CEST Schultschik, Sven via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Hello all together,
>
> I have created a small Applikation to zip and encrypte and vise versa.
>
> I struggle at the point of err = gpgme_op_decrypt(ctx, in, out);
> Which terminates with an segfault
Hi Ingo,
you were totally right.
I looked now for days at the code and didn't saw this trivial fault. The
Nullpoint check for the outstream was missing.
So I check now the outstream for nullpointer and catch it.
But a null point check for gpgme wouldn't be a bad idea. This way it could
be a
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:37:56AM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2021 18:56:15 schrieb Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users:
> > maybe interesting for some of you.
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign
>
> This does not have references on the problems it is claiming
10 matches
Mail list logo
