Re: Public keys on smartcard

2011-04-01 Thread Astrakan
Thanx for your input. Ok, so Im guessing the RSA-modulus (p and q) are stored on the card along with the private exponents, or perhaps the private key in its whole, already computed? How much of the RSA-operations are made on the card, in terms of key generation, signature making etc? Does anyone

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:34:14 -0600 Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com articulated: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:25:20PM -0400, Jerry wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:41:57 -0600 Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com articulated: http://passwordcard.org will fix that. :) Dumping GShit

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Aaron Toponce
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:15:44AM -0400, Jerry wrote: I think you are misunderstanding what I am inferring. For starters, that is the 5th account that I have heard or known of that was hacked in March alone. I am sure that the total is far higher based on a simple statistical accounting of

Re: Public keys on smartcard

2011-04-01 Thread David Shaw
On Apr 1, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Astrakan wrote: Thanx for your input. Ok, so Im guessing the RSA-modulus (p and q) are stored on the card along with the private exponents, or perhaps the private key in its whole, already computed? You should take a look at

Re: Public keys on smartcard

2011-04-01 Thread Grant Olson
On 4/1/11 3:51 AM, Astrakan wrote: Does anyone know the max storage capability of the v2.0 OpenPGP-cards? A few K? The v2 spec says they should support at least 2048k keys. The actual cards say they can handle up to 3072k. -- Grant I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Peter Lebbing
I think you are misunderstanding what I am inferring. For starters, that is the 5th account that I have heard or known of that was hacked in March alone. I am sure that the total is far higher based on a simple statistical accounting of the number of accounts using GMail. Happy Rob :) You

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Doug Barton
It's unclear to me how this thread relates to gnupg. Perhaps I'm missing something? Doug ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 El 31-03-2011 20:25, Jerry escribió: Dumping G[censored] would have been my first choice. I don't know why, the account compromised was from hotmail. I know some people hate free mail providers, but sometimes they are the most reliable

Re: Hi

2011-04-01 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 El 01-04-2011 9:15, Jerry escribió: ... Personally, I consider Google's web e-mail application grossly insecure. I further do not trust them for one millisecond to not be scanning documents passing through their server(s). It would not surprise

Re: Deniability

2011-04-01 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 El 22-03-2011 13:07, Jerome Baum escribió: ... What stops her from sending me real messages with this kind of content? Even non-encrypted? I could reply I don't know what you're talking about, but how does the prosecutor care? The only way