On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:06, faramir...@gmail.com said:
Hello,
Is key D869 2123 C406 5DEA 5E0F 3AB5 249B 39D2 4F25 E3B6 (
0x4F25E3B6 ) the current key used for signing files? I suppose it is,
Yes, it is. See my OpenPGP mail header for a list of all my keys and
their descriptions.
There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello Faramir !
Faramir faramir...@gmail.com wrote:
Is key D869 2123 C406 5DEA 5E0F 3AB5 249B 39D2 4F25 E3B6 (
0x4F25E3B6 ) the current key used for signing files? I suppose it is,
but I'd like to ask before issuing a local
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:03:59PM -0800, Davi wrote in
cabojjny9mupeymszbwrkajanrxvjkmx5dq8rhq1gorspo7x...@mail.gmail.com:
GnuPG crew,
Thank you in advance for your patience. I am new to Linux, new to Ubuntu,
and new the GnuPG and this is the first time I am trying to do any of this.
I
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:40:08 -0500
Robert J. Hansen articulated:
This comes fairly close to my own practices, with one significant
exception: since it's almost impossible for me to know whether all the
MUAs used on a mailing list support PGP/MIME, I feel it's better for
mailing list traffic
I tried to revoke this key since after changing a passphrase on 2012-01-28 and
using it with new passphrase immediately after, after a few hours I could not
again be successfull (bad passphrase).
But revkey also askes for a passphrase.
Is there any way to revoke this key?
Best regards
I tried to revoke this key since after changing a passphrase on 2012-01-28 and
using it with new passphrase imidiately after, after a few hours I could not
again be successfull (bad passphrase).
But revkey also askes for a passphrase.
Is there any way to revoke this key?
Best regards
On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header that seems at
least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC me on list replies. One copy
is enough.
Well, I don't know if you refer to me, my apologies if so. I know how that comes
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:28:39 -0600
John Clizbe articulated:
Interestingly enough, your Sig Delimiter is bonked.
That is an unfortunate consequence of signing my message with GnuPG;
all lines lose trailing spaces and any line beginning with a dash
gets prefixed with a dash and a
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:16, marko...@eunet.rs said:
Is there any way to revoke this key?
No. That is way we suggest to create and print out a revocation
certificate right after key creation.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:03, themuslimagor...@gmail.com said:
I successfully downloaded a package named gnupg-2.0.18.tar.bz2 from
gnupg.org. Following the instructions, I successfully configured the
package using the ./configure command, but when I attempted to compile he
Are you sure that the
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:22:43 +0100
Peter Lebbing articulated:
On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header
that seems at least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC
me on list replies. One copy is enough.
Well, I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Marko,
how I understood your issue: you have a key, changed it's passphrase and used
it successfully after that. Then, after some time, you could no longer use it
since GnuPG said you entered a bad passphrase.
If that's correct, here are my
Supporting the inline method is like supporting a grown child. If you
keep supporting him/her, they will never leave home. Stop supporting
them and they will leave. The same is true for inline PGP. If support
for it were to cease, it would also.
That was the idea behind the question I posed
On 31/01/12 16:23, Steve wrote:
You at least know that the person with that key is the author. That is some
information. Should I still stop signing list mails? So far, I used to do
that, because I though people then could check and if my key is signed by
someone they know it's a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/30/2012 06:09 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
I always get a chuckle every time I read someone writing that inline signing
is
somehow deprecated. Strangely enough, the only place I can find the
origination of such an idea is in the PGP/MIME RFC
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Steve wrote in
946fffc5-a191-4073-9d69-fc7fdc695...@gpgtools.org:
Of course, I really feel it's better for mailing list traffic to not
be signed at all, since usually all it gives us is a false sense of
security. A signature from an unvalidated key
On 01/31/2012 11:23 AM, Steve wrote:
Sometimes if the right parties decide to no longer support an old
standard the software that does not support the new (better)
standard will die or get improved...
This works if and only if the right parties are a large enough market
to push
Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 19:46:05 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
Enigmail isn't. Assume we
have 50,000 installations. (This sounds like a lot, but it's a pale
shadow compared to GnuPG installations.)
Do you mean hidden installations (used unnoticedly by a distribution's
update tool in the
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:07 -0500
Christopher J. Walters articulated:
It was my understanding that this bug had been fixed in Thunderbird,
but I may be mistaken. I know that in a GNU/Linux user mailing list
I have long been signed up for, I will occasionally receive CC's not
for replies to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 31-01-2012 9:12, Marko Randjelovic escribió:
I tried to revoke this key since after changing a passphrase on
2012-01-28 and using it with new passphrase immediately after,
after a few hours I could not again be successfull (bad
passphrase).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 31-01-2012 9:12, Marko Randjelovic escribió:
I tried to revoke this key since after changing a passphrase on
2012-01-28 and using it with new passphrase immediately after,
after a few hours I could not again be successfull (bad
passphrase).
Jerry wrote:
I totally agree. I have never seen or heard any logical excuse for the
signing of list traffic.
I almost never sign anything unless I suspect the destination can at
least ignore the signature. The people with whom I send e-mail (a
diminishing population because most have moved to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remco Rijnders wrote:
I appreciate signed mails on this list (and any other lists). Most
problems these days on the internet are, in my opinion, related to
people being completely anonymous. If you stand behind your words,
show so by signing
Dear
I would like to use GnuPG in my asp net application. I'm using bellow code and
it is working correctly on localhost, but after publishing on webserwer
(Windows server 2008 64 bits) encription not start, also with admin rights.
Could you tell me if is possible to use GnuPG 1.4.7 in asp net
On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
This is an OPT-INlist. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
this one.
I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this list
and all of the FreeBSD lists require you to subscribe. In fact FreeBSD
lists also use mailman.
--
From: Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Cc:
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:46:05 -0500
Subject: Re: PGP/MIME use (was Re: META)
I now see no utility to them for the vast majority of uses.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
One, albeit rather
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, re...@webconquest.com wrote:
Most problems these days on the internet are,
in my opinion, related to people being completely
anonymous. If you stand behind your words, show
so by signing your posts.
If the idea is more important than who said it, signing
(in both the
On 01/31/2012 13:08, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
On 01/31/2012 01:58 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
No. That is way we suggest to create and print out a revocation
certificate right after key creation.
Thanks all to your suggestions.
I just got one idea. I have a backup. Can I unpack my secret ring
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Hi
On Monday 30 January 2012 at 4:27:44 PM, in
mid:ab8b81216d496cec1af6fe8144c99...@biglumber.com, Greg Sabino
Mullane wrote:
That's exactly what the --not-dash-escaped option is
for.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 at 6:02:27 PM, in
mid:4f282cb3.3040...@lists.grepular.com, gn...@lists.grepular.com
wrote:
IMO, if there's one place you should be able to sign
email, it's the GnuPG users mailing list. It's called
dogfooding.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 06:35, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I have encounter two individuals, not on this list, who also think it
is cute to mail a response directly to the OP and then CC the list.
Honestly, some people are alive only because it seems cruel to kill a
retard.
I've done this
One, albeit rather unimportant, use is to help people with whom you
would like to regularly communicate access and check your key a bit
more easily, especially for people with multiple keys.
Putting a kludge in email headers or a OpenPGP Key ID: 0xD6B98E10 in
the sigblock seems to be a more
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:07 -0500
Christopher J. Walters articulated:
It was my understanding that this bug had been fixed in Thunderbird,
but I may be mistaken. I know that in a GNU/Linux user mailing list
I have long been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 30 January 2012 at 7:06:43 PM, in
mid:20120130190643.gb184...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx, brian m.
carlson wrote:
The problem is that unlike regular list messages, the
dupes don't come with the list headers, which makes
sorting them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 at 10:29:53 PM, in
mid:caeh5t2p4u+3nt7nlgwfjr6qh_72wlj7ygw5gabw1a1zjpss...@mail.gmail.com,
Paul Hartman wrote:
It's still missing the trailing space, assuming you put
one there in the first place... many people
Warning: do not take *any* of the numbers here seriously. They may be
completely divorced from reality. These numbers are like Monopoly money
-- completely fake, but still useful to illuminate important lessons
about the real thing.
This email is also quite long, and I apologize for that. I
On 1/31/2012 6:18 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
Okay, the harshness of language here has baited me to reply:
First, thank you for keeping your response civil. I appreciate it a lot.
There's a simple reason people do this, and it's because it is a
common choice for large lists, including the Linux
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:05 -0800
Doug Barton articulated:
On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
This is an OPT-INlist. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
this one.
I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this
list and all of the FreeBSD lists require you to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:04:57 -0500
Robert J. Hansen articulated:
And then I imagined my dean answering, That proves nothing: after
all, if I was posting this stuff I wouldn't sign it, either.
Don't apologize, I loved you post. One of the better one's I have read
in a while. It appears that
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:23:25PM +, MFPA wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 at 7:06:43 PM, in
mid:20120130190643.gb184...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx, brian m.
carlson wrote:
The problem is that unlike regular list messages, the
dupes don't come with the list headers, which makes
sorting
On 01/31/2012 16:17, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:05 -0800
Doug Barton articulated:
On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
This is an OPT-INlist. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
this one.
I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this
list and all of
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:41:16PM +, MFPA wrote in
516876184.20120131214116@my_localhost:
That's exactly what the --not-dash-escaped option is
for. Granted, it's not portable to some other PGP
implemetations, but if there is any mailing list in
world in which it would be acceptable, I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:08:26PM -0500, Jean-David wrote in
4f283c2a.6070...@verizon.net:
Remco Rijnders wrote:
I appreciate signed mails on this list (and any other lists). Most
problems these days on the internet are, in my opinion, related to
people being completely anonymous. If you
43 matches
Mail list logo
