On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 04:55:19PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:03, ambre...@gmail.com said:
>
> > Thanks for the detailed answer. But why not doing it for SSH then?
>
> I like to see when an ssh key is used the first time. Note that the
> maximum caching time for ssh
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 05:06:54PM -0600, helices wrote:
> I will probably never understand why wanting to run the most current
> version of gnupg on a plethora of servers is controversial.
>
> Nevertheless, the two (2) greatest reasons are:
>
>1. PCI DSS v3.2
>2. PCI DSS compliance
On Tue 2018-02-20 16:08:35 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:45, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>
>> GnuPG is under active development, and it has never had a fully-featured
>> stable API (Application Programming Interface). What i mean is, there
>> are some capabilities that are
On Tue 2018-02-20 13:18:40 +0100, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> One solution to this situation may be to install the latest GnuPG
> in a Docker container, where it can have all the required libraries
> and dependencies that it needs, without disturbing the host OS.
I think this misses the point that
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:45:52AM -0800, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> How can GnuPG contribute to fixing this problem? The traditional way
> that many other projects have taken is to define their core programmatic
> functionality into a library with a strict interface guarantees, and
> have
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:35:13PM +, Anna Kitces and Seth Fishman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I ran ./configure, make, make check and entered make install over an
> hour ago
That seems a bit long.
> the make check was clean
Cool.
> If I hit ctrl-C, how do I proceed?
>
> I am installing all the
At Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:08:35 +0100,
Werner Koch wrote:
> > Yet another complementary approach might be to aggressively police the
> > ecosystem by finding other software that deends on GnuPG in any of the
> > aforementioned brittle ways, and either ask those developers to stop
>
> That is what
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:45, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> GnuPG is under active development, and it has never had a fully-featured
> stable API (Application Programming Interface). What i mean is, there
> are some capabilities that are only available from the user interface
> (UI), and are not
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 01:30:06PM +, Green, Ian wrote:
> Hi
> Firstly, my knowledge of GPG is very weak and I am not a UNIX administrator,
> so my access and knowledge are rather limited.
>
> I have been asked to set up file encryption / decryption of files
> transferred between our SUN OS
On 02/20/2018 01:18 PM, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> If anybody is willing to give a try to any of these solutions I would
> like to help.
I would be generally cautious for both approaches without proper support
in the surrounding infrastructure. In particular an upgrade to a
depending library would
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On Sat 2018-02-17 17:06:54 -0600, helices wrote:
> > I will probably never understand why wanting to run the most current
> > version of gnupg on a plethora of servers is controversial.
>
> Here's one last try
On 19/02/18 19:45, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> But shrugging and suggesting it's uncontroversial to upgrade arbitrary
> machines to the latest version of GnuPG doesn't appreciate the scope of
> the problem involved with software maintenance in an active and
> interdependent ecosystem.
You are
12 matches
Mail list logo