-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Koppenhofer wrote:
I asked the same question in the form of a bug report on g10code
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1126
As you can see from the bug, it was recommended that I use gpg4win -
nevermind the fact I don't want or need all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Werner Koch wrote:
ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe
ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe.sig
and select only the GnuPG component.
If anyone tries this suggestion I would be interested to learn if it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sean Rima wrote:
Just removed 1.4.10, installed just the gpg section and restarted
GPGshell under Vista and it works fine
Since Werner and the literature state that it is Ok to install both
side-by-side is it really necessary to uninstall the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Attempting to Build svn5158 with the MSYS/MinGW Environment I came up
short with an Error I haven't seen before.
In the doc Directory the line below caused the Build process to Fail.
gnupg1.texi :4: @include 'version.texi' : No such file or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
IIRC, it's the first usable key with a matching User ID. Period. First one it
can use.
My usual 'solution' for this is to 'Disable' the non-preferred or unused
Key until such time as it is Revoked or I have been otherwise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Shaw wrote:
[1] PGP has a GUI nowadays, so this sort of thing doesn't apply in the
same way any longer. I don't have my copy of PGP command line online at
the moment, so I can't check what it does, but I'd be surprised if it
didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/22/2009 04:57 PM, John W. Moore III wrote:
Like GPG it utilizes the 1st encountered Key that matches the Send To:
address is valid.
this is not what gpg does. gpg simply chooses the first key with a
matching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
michael GRIFFITHS wrote:
Sorry I forgot to actually answer your question.
It will appear under the add/remove programs. For windows it will most
likely be named “GnuPG for windows”
IIRC, it will appear under Add/Remove Programs as GPGOL. [GPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Durant, Dean wrote:
Hello, I noticed, on windows (which I truly despise), when I type
C:\Documents and Settings\me\Application Data\gnupggpg --gen-key
I get:
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.12; Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. (add'l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sean Wilson wrote:
Why is it when I sign an email and someone replies to it I sometimes get
the following error:
Part of the message signed; click on 'Details' button for more information
in the details it says:
OpenPGP Security Info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
sari Al-alem wrote:
I dont know if this is the right place but im new to this encryption
software and i would like to ask some questions:
1- does GPG have to be installed on all users who will recieve my mail?
Short Answer = Yes. Long Answer =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
M.B.Jr. wrote:
Thanks again, David.
The last dumb question, I promise, would be:
There aren't any dumb questions.
Yes, there are! They are the Questions that _were_never_ asked!
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Wednesday 18 Nov 2009,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tobias Holz wrote:
Hey Folks,
i succesfully installed gnupg on my Win7 machine. I want to use it
with Thunderbird to encrypt personal eMails.
Now I've got some questions:
1) What does happen if I lose my private key? Can I burn it to a CD/DVD?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jerry wrote:
Maybe not totally apropos to this discussion; however, I worked in
traffic analysis for several years. If given enough leeway, you would
be amazed at the information you can gather about an individual, and at
its astonishing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Laurent Jumet wrote:
Hello Smith, !
Smith, Cathy cathy.sm...@pnl.gov wrote:
I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
interactive prompt doesn't pop up. This encryption does need to run in a
batch job. What do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
http://jessekornblum.livejournal.com/259124.html
For quite some time we've known that hibernation files present risks for
information security. However, there are always those who say until I
see an actual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
When you have composed your email, but before hitting SEND; click on the
little down arrow next to the S/MIME button and remove the check mark
next to Digitally Sign and Digitally Encrypt. Then hit SEND!
JOHN :)
Timestamp: Tue 05 July 2005,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While polishing my settings on this new PC, I realize I've forgotten how
to set RIPEMD160 as the Hash Algo to use. Running M$ XP with
1.4.2/Enigmail GPGshell 3.45. Help Appreciated!
JOHN :)
Timestamp: Wed 10 August 2005, 06:58 PM --400 (Eastern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On August 1st...Maxine Brandt died in Hospital. The COD was a chronic
lung infection. Below I am including the Post I placed on PGPNET, in
addition to some comments included to other folks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
There is a Thunderbird Extension offered at:
http://www.thunderbird-mail.de/
However, being nowhere fluent in German (I can only ask for a Beer,
Woman and the Men's Room) I haven't a clue as to whether or not this
would be a practical extension
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Alphax wrote:
You trust the Microsoft CryptoAPI? Well why don't you just run Windows,
which Microsoft Says is Perfectly Secure, and use Microsoft's inbuilt
X.509 instead of OpenPGP, since Microsoft Guarantees No Back Doors in
the CryptoAPI?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 10:07 +0800, nidhog wrote:
Do you guys have any suggestion as to how to go about encrypting a
partition that can be available both to linux and win32?
It's not easy to do this, and I don't think it will get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It would be easier to confirm the sig if one had the Key or ability to
Import it.
JOHN :)
Timestamp: Thursday 13 Oct 2005, 06:50 PM --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
2. frequency of changing passphrases
- in a user who accesses emails via net cafes (think keyloggers)
Also good idea. Let's say after each use via net cafes, as soon as
possible. Well, would be ideally.
However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tad Marko wrote:
Right, which is the reason for the continued need to let people know
your key signature via a trusted means. But, if someone was wanting to
hassle you by creating scads of bogus keys on keyservers, it still
makes it that much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Neil Williams wrote:
As I said, you can verify my key via someone else. Once your key is in the
strong set this becomes a lot easier. I regularly come across keys used on
this list that are instantly verified by the web of trust.
The web of
Johan Wevers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
might be interesting to see the year 2020 gnupg version,
the max keylength proposed then,
and then link back to this thread ;-)
Considering the direction the EU is moving, it might be very wel that
key lengts above 64 bits RSA or DH are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Clizbe wrote:
Without context it is difficult to tell.
My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
I believe your Guess to be correct. Since the Release of GnuPG 1.4.3
*will* contain support for PKA Key retrieval (among
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You're using GnuPG 1.2.1, so the immediate suggestion would be to
upgrade to 1.4.2. A *lot* has changes since 1.2.1.
JOHN :)
Timestamp: Monday 23 Jan 2006, 15:02 --500 (Eastern Standard Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charly Avital wrote:
Option 2 is better, IMO.
I don't think you can create a new uid *without* an e-mail address,
unless you present it (when going through the generation's prompts) as
something that looks like an e-mail address, e.g.
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Remco Post wrote:
since the xscale cpu found in most wm 5.0 devices is in no way
compatible with an ia32 (eg pentium) cpu, this is nonsense. There is
some effort on gnupg on wince/wm, but it is nowhere near production
ready... more like alpha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David makes a very good point! The possibility strongly exists that an
individual has requested a /specific/ Keyserver for refreshing or
downloading their Key because they have control of their Key that way.
They may *not* wish that their Key be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
feitao wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, by default, GunPG uses ElGamal to encrypt/decrypt files,
and the recommended key length is 1024 bit. Is there any information on how
encryption/decryption time changes with the key length? Thanks a lot,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Throughout the 'snapshot' phase of 1.4.3 this ability was turned OFF by
default. With the release of 1.4.3 stable and the availability of
cross-certification and pka-lookup now widely available, will the
features once defaulted to off be defaulted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charly Avital wrote:
But when I Quit, I am prompted to save changes:
--
Command quit
Save changes? (y/N) n
Quit without saving? (y/N) y
--
I have chosen to quit without saving any changes, because the truth is I
do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
OS setting via LC_TIME, according to Microsoft, though I have no idea
how to set it on win32.
Right Click on the Clock, Select Setting Time/Date.
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Thursday 06 Apr 2006, 18:36 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
jkaye wrote:
I know that for PGP, there's an environment setting that
can be used to prevent this. Is there a similar thing for
GnuPG, or do I have to jump through some hoops?
Hmm.Let me see if I've understood you. You desire to use GPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raphaël Poss wrote:
You can:
- use gpg-agent, or
- echo passphrase | gpg --batch --passphrase-fd 0
Of course the latter provides little to no security.
There is another option. Since you are using Outlook (presumably for
Corporate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
That's sort of an apples and oranges question. CAST5 is a 128-bit
cipher. AES256 is a 256-bit cipher. Is CAST5 weaker than AES256?
Yes, but that's that not to say that CAST5 is broken somehow: AES256
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael D. Berger wrote:
What am I doing wrong? In any case, if I could get the result by
editing gpg.conf I would prefer it.
Well, many folks will advise you *not* to do this because if you should
send an encrypted message to someone who does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sarixe Avaliesz wrote:
Hey all,
I was wondering if it was possible to configure GPA to run solely from a
USB drive. Is it possible to have a gpa.conf on the USB so that it
doesn't require it in Application Data? Thanks.
Sarixe
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Adam Funk wrote:
Thanks. Will it be possible later either to un-lsign the key or to
sign it properly (for export)?
Er.Ahem.Re-Signing the Key _with_ an 'Exportable' Signature does
this. This *is* an available feature via Enigmail and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Zach Himsel wrote:
- gpg control packet
Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have seen in the spec rfc3156 that a message should be signed and
| then encrypted, but hypothetically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Zach Himsel wrote:
My private key was recently compromised (Which sucks, I know). I was in
the process of generating a new keypair when I realized Why do I use
RSA? What's the difference. Hence my question :)
If I *do* use DSA/ElGamal, what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Zach Himsel wrote:
I created a RSA key that can sign and encrypt (only one key, no subkey).
Is that ok? Or is that a security and/or performance weakness? Or is it
better?
That's Fine! There is *no* security weakness there; as long as the Key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Snoken wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find any gpg-zip-program after installing GnuPG
1.4.3 for Windows.
The announce message tells:
Added gpg-zip, a program to create encrypted archives that can
interoperate with PGP Zip.
gpg.zip has nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:00, Andrew Bunting said:
In other words, if the software had a tripwire function that
notified other nominated individuals when a private key was
exported then the subject of the notice may not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jørgen Lysdal wrote:
Is there anything i can put in my options file that will make
gpg use SHA256 for my RSA and RIPEMD160 for my DSA without
having the personal-digest-preferences thing in my options file?
This is really important to me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bo Berglund wrote:
Is there a new binary version also for gpg4win that includes this
release?
Not just yet; however, Werner's Release Announcement *did* state that
the 'New' gpg4win package _will_ be available very shortly.
JOHN :-D
Timestamp:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alphax wrote:
Note that it's also not immediately obvious what the format of the
signature packet used in a clearsigned message is... I haven't looked at
the working draft of the RFC but hopefully it's a lot clearer than the
published version.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alphax wrote:
PGP/MIME capable mail clients /may/ handle it, but you'd have to
actually try it to be certain. Such a test should be conducted off-list
in order to avoid flames for an HTML posting.
I can't imagine anyone 'Flaming' an honest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bjoern Buerger wrote:
Michael Kallas wrote:
hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or hkp://sks.keyserver.penguin.de ?
Sorry, the latter is down at the moment. But you can
try hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de instead,
which is a collection of public sks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NOT a Judge...But a very avid, discerning User. Since every submission
has been made in .png Format I have save my Favorites. Those
individuals using senderface.xpi within their T-
Bird installs will be able to see some of my selections based upon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Peter S. May wrote:
Again, such is true for the uids themselves. But revocations for uids
that the client doesn't have might or might not be considered
superfluous. Perhaps we find a revocation for a uid we don't have yet
on one keyserver and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Aldert Hazenberg wrote:
On Nov 13, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
A port to Windows might
eventually be done but as of now I see no reason for it.
What is your reason for no windows port of 2.0 ?
Is it a business reason ? Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Charly Avital wrote:
1. Apple's Powerbook G4 1.33GHz, MacOSX 10.4.8, gpg 1.4.5, gpg2 (with
gpg-agent) 1.9.20, card reader SCR243, OpenPGPCard.
2. Public key URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
reynt0 wrote:
On Fri Dec 01, 2006, Alphax wrote:
I saw something weird where moving entries around didn't preserve the
order that you had put things in... I ended up writing out all the
option numbers on scraps of paper and shuffling them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Aaron J. Graves wrote:
Here's an example. From the key in question:
pub 1024D/9FB54294 created: 2006-09-17 expires: never usage: SC
trust: ultimate validity: ultimate
sub 4096g/DE94A6C4 created: 2006-09-17 expires: never usage: E
And from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
You can get GnuPG from: ftp://ftp.no.gpg4win.org
After you have installed GnuPG, start Thunderbird with Enigmail
installed. It will usually find GnuPG automatically. Then, the easiest
way to get started is to use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
If I'm wrong, I invite people to say so, so that I may be corrected. If
I'm right, I invite people to say so, so that you may be corrected.
I believe I understood your motivation in advocating Donations to FSF
clearly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Björn Mayer wrote:
I would like to sign text without first having to create a file where I
have to write the text into.
-- is it possible to hand the text directly from the standard input?
As well I would like to obtain the signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
snowcrash+gnupg-users wrote:
if my purpose it to impart additional 'confidence' in B to _others_,
by signing it with A, then i would *NOT* want to 'lsign', but rather
just sign/tsign, *and* publish the pubkey for A.
correct?
YES, this would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
snowcrash+gnupg-users wrote:
that said, is there any reason NOT to (or, any advantage to ...):
*l*sign B with A, and, therefore, NOT distribute A to the
keyservers /or via export -- and, instead, reference the A
trust-ing-pubkey @ a web page?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sebsatian von Thadden wrote:
Under windows, I've never built anything. - But, I can learn it:-)
If anyone is building on Vista (or building elsewhere but using it on
Vista), try this patch.
Thanks a lot for your very fast work. I hope,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bruce Cowin wrote:
If I have generated a key using PGP Desktop, would I be able to import
and use that key with GnuPG? Our subscription to PGP Desktop is about
to expire and it says the functionality will be reduced to that of PGP
Freeware. All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Could anybody tell me how to sign a email under Windows by using
GnuPG? I've done some google, but could not find any Windows mail
Typically, this is done with the assistance of an email plugin.
Probably the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Moses wrote:
My question sound dumb
Nonsense; the only 'dumb' Question is the one not asked!
How to better protect private keys of GPG users?
Some folks 'protect' themselves from this by storing their Keyrings on
removable media. (USB Memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
Same person. Same key. Just a new email address. Plus the revoked address
gives
clueful folks the hint that email shouldn't be sent there.
Also, the same 'clueful folks' can derive some knowledge form the Sigs
on the Revoked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jørgen Christiansen Lysdal wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
It's historical. Older versions of GPG generated keys with a standard
hash preference of RIPEMD/160 before SHA-1. When GPG later started
using that hash preference to decide which hash to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jørgen Christiansen Lysdal wrote:
John W. Moore III wrote:
Or change it; say to SHA 256?
That will not work, since my goal is not to factor in my own prefs.
Not all keys support sha256, so that will leave gpg complaining when
i encrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
gpg --edit-key keyID
then 'help' for a listing.
You'll want adduid and possibly addphoto
BTW - is my signature valid?
It was for me:
gpg: Good signature from Richard Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: WARNING: This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- i can't revoke it -- no passphrase :-(
- i still need the email adresses with the useless keys
- i definitely can't find the passphrase
OK, Stupid Response Question First:
Did You have the common sense to generate a Revocation Certificate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
And while we're handing out movie recommendations, try for a 1974
Francis Ford Coppola movie called The Conversation. Easily the
best fictional movie I've ever seen about real-world communications
security.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Chris wrote:
I'll be changing over to my new email address tomorrow so I want to make sure
I understand the procedure. According to the manpage I want to run $gpg
--edit-key [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm then presented with this info:
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Shaw wrote:
This year is slightly different in that I'm waiting for someone to
discover they can also raise the key size limit for DSA. That, at
least, is marginally less strange as I put in code to make the hash
size automatically rise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:49:21PM -0400, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
My gnupg file that I get with edit-keys myuid
contains, among other things:
sub 2048g/48FF0850 created: 2007-02-24 expires: 2008-02-24
sub 4096g/124E0663
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Andrew Berg wrote:
There was a mismatch of GPG versions. I fixed that, and FireGPG makes
valid signatures with GPG 2.0.4.
The algorithm 11 not available problem remains, though.
'Algorithm 11' or S11 is Camellia and *should not* be Enabled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Victor Stuart wrote:
Well, I use GnuPG 1.4.7 and 2.0.6 compiled by MingW32, they don't
support bzip2.
I Compile the 1.4.Branch using MinGW I have bzip2. Did You remember
to include it when compiling?
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Monday 20 Aug 2007,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
There's no guarantee that your key won't end up on a keyserver nor is there
one
that your private email address won't leak into the public,
All it takes is 1 inadvertent click of 'Refresh All Keys' or a well
intentioned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nigel Brown wrote:
I should have known better than to doubt Mr Hansen.
Nonsense! Mr. Hansen thrives on being doubted as this is what keeps
Him on His toes. :-D *LOL*
Seriously; any time You Question a statement for reasons other than
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Oskar L. wrote:
Traffic analysis will reveal what time you are active, and how much data
you are transferring. To only way to protect against it is to download and
upload all the time at a constant rate. Not worth it in my situation.
It will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I am not a GnuPG developer; they may disagree with me or outright say
hey, sure, we'll support it. That said, I think that what I'm saying
here is in rough accordance with their vision of the GnuPG project. If
I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Using MSYS with svn4620 the 'make' bombs in doc with:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/Compaq_Owner/4620/doc'
make check-am
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/Compaq_Owner/4620/doc'
cc -o yat2m ./yat2m.c
/bin/sh: cc: command not found
make[2]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While I was checking for the 'first cause' of the previous Failure I
discovered this:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/Compaq_Owner/4620/doc'
: Warning: missing faqprog.pl, cannot make FAQ
echo No FAQ due to missing faqprog.pl FAQ
echo See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Clizbe wrote:
John W. Moore III wrote:
While I was checking for the 'first cause' of the previous Failure I
discovered this:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/Compaq_Owner/4620/doc'
: Warning: missing faqprog.pl, cannot make FAQ
echo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
reynt0 wrote:
Just a maybe picky question:
Does stops new use mean absolutely, like mechanical
prevention, stops new use, or does it mean something like
stops by a social process, ie like knowledgeable users
won't use it anymore?
On Fri, 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
So it would be great if someone could tell me how they differ when
it comes to security and efficiency.
Answering this in detail will require at least a solid undergraduate
degree in either CS or mathematics.
Robert's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Brad Tilley wrote:
I have three separate gpg secret keys. Initially, I wanted to keep the
keys seperate, but today I'd like to have them all together. Is there a
way to merge the keys into one key keeping them as they are now?
Simply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Why would you trust the opinions of random people you've never met?
For the same reason that One might ask Jim Jones about the Nutritional
Value of the Kool-Aid. :-D
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Thursday 13 Dec 2007, 08:50 --500
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
nate eccels wrote:
Does gpg have any trapdoors.
Have You ever heard the story about the Frog the Scorpion on the river
bank?
Still, asking this Question in the Developers Forum indicated a certain
amount of Faith that the writers of the code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Werner Koch wrote:
There is well known saying attributed to Phil Zimmermann:
When encryption is outlawed, only outlaws have encryption.
Borrowed no doubt from the U.S. National Rifle Association motto of
the '60's:
When Guns are Outlawed;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Crick wrote:
tp://www.flickr.com/photos/hsaito/2125495667/
Yum-Yum. The question is just how we cut the slices for all users.
Werner
surely this is an example of the dining cryptographers problem!
Perhaps the 'Birthday Cake'
line and output:
/usr/local/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -d
- --passphrase-fd 0 --no-use-agent
gpg: encrypted with 3072-bit ELG-E key, ID 684C50FA, created 2005-09-23
JOHN W. MOORE III
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit ELG-E key, ID 2215D1C7, created 2002-07-23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I have a Correspondent who has built 1.4.8 from the tar.gz for use on
Ubuntu. For some reason the Build, even after passing all 27 tests
does not list BZIP2 as an available for of compression.:-\ Since
the PK is distributed with BZIP2 in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here is the gpg.conf i'm using, in case i overlooked something:
openpgp
The above line needs to be added to Your gpg.conf You'll be using 3DES.
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Tuesday 15 Jan 2008, 15:14 --500 (Eastern Standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- Original Message
Subject: Need tips on how to backup my keys
From: Steven Woody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:38:33 AM
When one day my hardisk go bad and I can not access my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- Original Message
Subject: more than one recipient
From: Bruce Cowin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 6:16:04 PM
This is probably a dumb, basic question but is it possible to list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- Original Message
Subject: Cannot Set the Expiration Date on Secure Subkeys
From: David Botham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Monday, February 18, 2008 8:35:33 PM
All,
I am having problems setting the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Colin Watson wrote:
In other words, it looks like any time I go through an --edit-key /
--send-keys / --recv-keys cycle (however extended), I'm going to grow
six new signatures on my key. Could GnuPG be fixed to check for
duplicates before it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nicholas Cole wrote:
But that does not mean the web of trust is useless - far from it.
OpenPGP lets you represent all sorts of trust models: you can choose
trust the root key of a company, university or computer software
project, and thereby
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
