Daniel Cerqueira via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I want to send my po translation of GnuPG.
> Werner told me to send a signed git patch to a list.
> So, I signed my git commit with my GnuPG key. And when I do `git
> format-patch master` the created patch does not have this signature.
> should show/log an error.
I guess I'd really like that to just happen with some
--I-really-want-isolated-gnupg
option.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect
do I fix that?
> I am happy to substitute the udev rules with a timer, or to call some
> command to give permissions every time I want to use the YubiKey or the
> OpenPGP card. I just would like the whole process to be more reliable.
> Currently, it’s extremely frustrating.
!-
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> The yubikey performs cryptography on the device, but does have a small
> amount of flash memory to store the private key material. The yubikey
> does not provide any method to copy the private key material back off
> that storage, it can only be
red by outsiders.
> This is not possible with a Yubikey. If you want the same (sub)keys on
> multiple devices you must generate them on your laptop and copy them to
> each device in turn, remembering not to delete until you’re done.
okay, so in this case we are using
Juanjo via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> should eventually describe the environment.
>> >
>> > Yes please. > Could it go into a wiki page or something that people
>> can comment on and/or > amend?
>>
>> feel free to open a page with the info that Werner has already given
>>
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:22, Juanjo said:
>> This works fine with a single Yubikey, but we wanted to have more than
>> one connected at the same time in order to batch-configure them and
>> even to try to use multiple SSH key authentication in
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> The only way that a company would end up archiving a password reset
> email encrypted to an ADK would be if an employee was using their work
> email address for password resets. If using their work email for this
> purpose is inadvisable, then it is
Many companies with forced proxis are starting to realize that
they become liable when they store banking login cookies.
Anyway, I think senders need to be made mildly aware that it's occuring, and
I think they should be allowed to pick a specific ADK or suppress them all in
certain circu
Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> ADKs seem particularly valuable to me as a solution to the "group inbox"
> problem that avoids actually sharing private key material: simply
> attach encryption subkeys for all recipients to the "group inbox"
> certificate. This requires
David Joaquín Shourabi Porcel wrote:
> I am researching GnuPG for my employer. We will stick with the old
> release series 2.2 at first, because few Linux distributions package
> 2.3 or 2.4 yet. However, I'm studying newer versions and recent
> developments to ease our future
It's not the technical work or the system resources that are really the
challenge (I think that there is plenty of technical volunteers).
It's the promises about moderation and other softer human resources that seem
to really be the limit for running Mastodon instances.
Maybe FSF.org will do
Michael Richardson wrote:
> Yeah, the marketing department screwed it up, and should have put
> on it. It suggests that it has never really been used.
I sent an encrypted email to the newspaper, pointing them at this thread, and
the problems they have.
signature.asc
Descriptio
Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Hello Jay,
> Il 05 agosto 2022 alle 17:28 Jay Sulzberger via Gnupg-users ha scritto:
>> Does the PGP public key at
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news-tips/ work?
> It gets copied in a weird way (i.e. some characters that should be
>
The key on that page is line wrapped.
If I replace the right spaces with newlines, then it seems to work import okay.
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: Mailvelope v4.6.0
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
xsDNBGLr60kBDAC7/dyy27fxfbaE1Ss13QI9li93YePYFNjLW1JonvNcsmN+
Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote:
> It's frustrating that the releases are signed with a cipher that cannot
> be verified on a reasonably popular distro.
At least, multiple signatures could be made.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
San
.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[
pgpWBpGjrKqLy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[
pgpxyAsFJlM_e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
18 matches
Mail list logo
