On 23/03/13 21:06, adrelanos wrote:
TrueCrypt.org says [1] they are signing TrueCrypt Setup 7.1a.exe [2]
with a X.509 signature. How can I verify such a signature?
This is probably a Microsoft Authenticode signature on a Microsoft PE
executable. It's very specifically a Microsoft thing, and
* adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
TrueCrypt.org says [1] they are signing TrueCrypt Setup 7.1a.exe
[2] with a X.509 signature. How can I verify such a signature?
For Windows, they explicitly state how to do that.
(On Debian Wheezy.) I tried:
gpg2 --verify TrueCrypt Setup 7.1a.exe
Markus Reichelt:
* adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
TrueCrypt.org says [1] they are signing TrueCrypt Setup 7.1a.exe
[2] with a X.509 signature. How can I verify such a signature?
For Windows, they explicitly state how to do that.
Yes, that's easily working.
(On Debian Wheezy.)
Peter Lebbing:
On 23/03/13 21:06, adrelanos wrote:
TrueCrypt.org says [1] they are signing TrueCrypt Setup
7.1a.exe [2] with a X.509 signature. How can I verify such a
signature?
This is probably a Microsoft Authenticode signature on a
Microsoft PE executable. It's very specifically a
On 24/03/13 13:10, adrelanos wrote:
I don't care so much about that truecrypt.exe, but want to know how it
works in general for any file on Linux. This is because I consider dual
signing the files I distribute.
If it's about signing rather than verifying, I found this link on the Google
hunt I
