Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2016-12-28 Thread Miroslav Rovis
-s $ git push --tags and all was there, signed and verifiable for everbody, without the need to have previously posted your own public key to github.com. Up until just last year, IIRC. Any ideas for true reasons behind that move? And is it an improvement, or quite the contrary? -- Miro

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2016-12-28 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 161228-11:43+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: ... > > The fact that Github, since this outgoing year, accept gpg signing only > if you post your public key to their servers. Just some quick links in connection, for the less familiar. For users (like me): https://help.github.com/categ

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2016-12-29 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 161228-15:42+0100, NdK wrote: > Il 28/12/2016 13:28, Miroslav Rovis ha scritto: > > >> The fact that Github, since this outgoing year, accept gpg signing only > >> if you post your public key to their servers. > I can't say for sure, but maybe that's so s

Re: informations on installation ubuntu 16.04

2016-12-29 Thread Miroslav Rovis
vilion-17-Notebook-PC:~/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.30$ sudo > makemake: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.   > Stop.abcdef@abcdef-HP-Pavilion-17-Notebook-PC:~/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.30$ make > installmake: *** No rule to make target 'install'.   > Stop.abcdef@abcdef-HP-Pavi

Re: Renewing expired keys

2017-01-18 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170115-22:17+0100, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez wrote: ... > Lastly, revoke the old one if you aren't going to use it publicly anymore. Isn't is wrong to revoke a key which you don't consider was compromised? If you don't want to use it, it suffices that it is expired,

Re: Renewing expired keys

2017-01-18 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170118-22:59+1030, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > Le 2017-01-18 à 22:48, Miroslav Rovis a écrit : > > On 170115-22:17+0100, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez wrote: > > ... > >> Lastly, revoke the old one if you aren't going to use it publicly anymore. > > Isn't

Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)

2017-01-19 Thread Miroslav Rovis
the Perfection that rules, unseen by the miopic views of the subjects that do not want to admit they are not, and can't be, and never will be gods, in the sense of complete control, say, of even their own lives, let alone any wider reality around their lives. Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagre

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2017-01-30 Thread Miroslav Rovis
I'm reviving this end-of-last-year thread, because... On 161228-15:42+0100, NdK wrote: > Il 28/12/2016 13:28, Miroslav Rovis ha scritto: > > >> The fact that Github, since this outgoing year, accept gpg signing only > >> if you post your public key to their servers

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2017-01-30 Thread Miroslav Rovis
they serve mail and all with IIS. Heaven fall on us from shame! ) On 170131-00:42+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: ... > It's this repo, where the latest two tags are PGP-signed: > https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/tags > ... > gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --rec

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2017-01-30 Thread Miroslav Rovis
s/143 ( BTW, looks like a fine addon. For Palemoon, but of course for Firefox as well, if people haven't yet switched. ) On 170131-00:42+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > I'm reviving this end-of-last-year thread, because... > It's this repo, where the latest two tags are PGP-si

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2017-02-06 Thread Miroslav Rovis
oaded, or the lack of expertize on my part. On 170131-01:20+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: While most of it about GnuPG key over at: The GPG key is missing from common keyservers #143 > https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/issues/143 is solved, my issues also stem the prerequisites for sec

Re: ? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

2017-02-07 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170206-18:51-0500, Antony Prince wrote: > On 2/6/2017 6:01 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > Maybe just if anybody can confirm whether another key is or is not > > available from the common keyservers, as that is the only one that I > > haven't manage

HTTPS keyservers (with SSL-keys recording), WAS: help

2017-03-15 Thread Miroslav Rovis
s is doing. It is allowing > you to have a functional dbus and convenient ssh key storage while > using your desktop. You can do without these conveniences, but maybe > not with debian... so what you saw here is regular behavior, unlikely > to be in any way interacting with the Internet.

Re: HTTPS keyservers (with SSL-keys recording)

2017-03-15 Thread Miroslav Rovis
> Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. Deutch schreiben, lesen und schprechen I möchte lernen... Aber kein zeit für jetzt... ( I like German, and German-speaking nations, culture and way of life a lot. ) Sincere respect and regards to you and your team

Re: --export-options export-reset-subkey-passwd

2018-03-11 Thread Miroslav Rovis
ten go offline, physically disconnecting from the internet, for just the time to type the password to do the encryption/signing. So maybe a question to advanced users/devs. Any tips on protection from the dangers to my subkeys (and subkeys of those who will come along from my tutorial pages) from