AW: AW: Break backwards compatibility already: it’s time. Ignore the haters. I trust you.

2018-05-22 Thread Fiedler Roman
> Von: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] Im Auftrag von > > On 22/05/18 10:44, Fiedler Roman wrote: > > Such a tool might then e.g. be used on a MitM message reencryption > > gateway: the old machines still send messages with old > > (deprecated/legacy options), they are

Re: AW: Break backwards compatibility already: it’s time. Ignore the haters. I trust you.

2018-05-22 Thread Andrew Gallagher
On 22/05/18 10:44, Fiedler Roman wrote: > Such a tool might then e.g. be used on a MitM message reencryption > gateway: the old machines still send messages with old > (deprecated/legacy options), they are transformed by "gpg-archive": > The full data (old message, old decrypt report, reencrypted

AW: Break backwards compatibility already: it’s time. Ignore the haters. I trust you.

2018-05-22 Thread Fiedler Roman
Hello list, I failed to decide, which message would be the best to reply to, so I took one with a title, rational humanists could be proud of. Ignoring the title, many of the messages had valid arguments for both sides. From my point of view the main difference seems to be, what is believed to