On Fri 2018-05-18 05:31:36 +, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> I see. If understood correctly, the trusted.gpg.d bypasses key
> management with apt-key completely, so not running into problems with
> apt-key deprecation.
I'm actually advocating avoiding trusted.gpg.d entirely as well, and
moving to
Il 18/05/2018 07:31, Fiedler Roman ha scritto:
> I thought about that also, but shouldn't 99%+ of systems perform no pinning
> whatsoever of packages to repositories? In that case, the "wrong" repository
> could publish just a slightly increased package version number of a package
> from
> Von: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net]
>
> On Thu 2018-05-17 15:37:55 +, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> > Von: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net]
> >
> >> See sources.list(5) and
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty for more details.
> >>
>
On Thu 2018-05-17 15:37:55 +, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> Von: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net]
>
>> See sources.list(5) and
>> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty for more details.
>>
>> See also https://bugs.debian.org/877012 for suggestions about
>>
> Von: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net]
>
> On Thu 2018-05-17 08:45:18 +, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> > As gnupg starts getting more and more problematic regarding some
> > functions (see the discussions on command line/unattended use), Ubuntu
> > Bionic AND Debian Buster
On Thu 2018-05-17 08:45:18 +, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> As gnupg starts getting more and more problematic regarding some
> functions (see the discussions on command line/unattended use), Ubuntu
> Bionic AND Debian Buster dropped it from their debootstrap
I don't know about Ubuntu Bionic, but for
Just a foreword: sorry for not acknowledging all the good proposals you make -
many of them I can fully second - and all the good changes you apply, I really
appreciate them. I just do not reply to all of them ...
> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 10:45,
> Von: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] Im Auftrag von
>
> Am Donnerstag 17 Mai 2018 10:45:18 schrieb Fiedler Roman:
> > As gnupg starts getting more and more problematic regarding some
> functions
> > (see the discussions on command line/unattended use)
>
> Can you give me
> Von: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] Im Auftrag von
>
> Am Mittwoch 16 Mai 2018 15:46:05 schrieb Martin:
> > I think a fundamental discussion is necessary with the question: Who
> > should / will use GnuPG in the future?
>
> Note that during one contract in 2016 we came up
