Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-10 Thread Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
On 2016-10-10 at 23:48, MFPA wrote: > I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15 > isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version > 2.3.3 (2016-08-18). > I think it's mostly the GpgOl and GpgEx parts of the bundle that are in beta, unless there's

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-10 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 11:53:10 PM, in , Schlacta, Christ wrote:- > What we need is whomever maintains > gpg4win to release a guide on how to have it utilize the

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-09 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 1:46:19 PM, in , Rohit P wrote:- > Thanks. > I downloaded the second item from the link you provided. It has no > front-end and

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread Rohit P
6 3:54 PM To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users Cc: Rohit P Subject: Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in <mid:maxpr01mb04127abd7bd6879c5ee2993197...@maxpr01mb0412.indprd01.prod.outlook.com>, Rohit P wrote:- > In

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in , Rohit P wrote:- > In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with > an option to encrypt text

GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread Rohit P
In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with an option to encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG has no such option. I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. Are these one and the same thing? Windows binary is not available for