Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-10 Thread Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez 
On 2016-10-10 at 23:48, MFPA wrote:
> I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15
> isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version
> 2.3.3 (2016-08-18).
> 

I think it's mostly the GpgOl and GpgEx parts of the bundle that are in
beta, unless there's something different on Kleopatra and GPA Gpg4Win
builds.

-- 
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez

GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-10 Thread MFPA 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 11:53:10 PM, in
,
Schlacta, Christ wrote:-


> What we need is whomever maintains
> gpg4win to release a guide on how to have it utilize the system's
> install gnupg, so we can get 2.1.x working with some decent
> management interfacen.


Note: I use GnuPG 2.1.15 under Windows but do not use gpg4win.

That said, have you tried gpg4win's beta version?
Gpg4win version 3.0.0-beta187 (2016-09-05) includes GnuPG 2.1.15.
I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15
isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version
2.3.3 (2016-08-18).


- --
Best regards

MFPA  

After all is said and done, a lot more will be said than done.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=CJP2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-09 Thread MFPA 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 1:46:19 PM, in
,
Rohit P wrote:-


> Thanks.

> I downloaded the second item from the link you provided. It has no
> front-end and the readme file says it can be run only from
> command-line.

That's as it should be. Well done.


- --
Best regards

MFPA  

Don't cry because it is over - smile because it happened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=N/vC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread Rohit P 
Thanks.


I downloaded the second item from the link you provided. It has no front-end 
and the readme file says it can be run only from command-line.




RP


From: MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2016 3:54 PM
To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users
Cc: Rohit P
Subject: Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in
<mid:maxpr01mb04127abd7bd6879c5ee2993197...@maxpr01mb0412.indprd01.prod.outlook.com>,
Rohit P wrote:-


> In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with
> an option to encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG
> has no such option.

That would come from some frontend or Explorer plugin, not from GnuPG
itself.



> I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win.
> Are these one and the same thing?

GPG4win is GnuPG 2.0.x bundled with a choice of certificate managers,
plugins for Outlook and Windows Explorer, and the Gpg4win Compendium
documentation. They also have "light" and "vanilla" downloads that
eschew some or all of the extras.



> Windows binary is not available for download from GnuPG site.

Windows binaries for GnuPG versions 2.1.x and 1.4.x are the second and
third items listed at <https://gnupg.org/download/index.html#sec-1-2>.

The first list item points you to the GPG4win download page.



- --
Best regards

MFPA  <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>

It is easy to propose impossible remedies.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=ymqs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread MFPA 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in
,
Rohit P wrote:-


> In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with
> an option to encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG
> has no such option.

That would come from some frontend or Explorer plugin, not from GnuPG
itself.



> I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win.
> Are these one and the same thing?

GPG4win is GnuPG 2.0.x bundled with a choice of certificate managers,
plugins for Outlook and Windows Explorer, and the Gpg4win Compendium
documentation. They also have "light" and "vanilla" downloads that
eschew some or all of the extras.



> Windows binary is not available for download from GnuPG site.

Windows binaries for GnuPG versions 2.1.x and 1.4.x are the second and
third items listed at .

The first list item points you to the GPG4win download page.



- --
Best regards

MFPA  

It is easy to propose impossible remedies.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=ymqs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

2016-10-08 Thread Rohit P 
In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with an option to 
encrypt text on current window.


Newer versions of GnuPG has no such option.


I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. Are these one 
and the same thing?


Windows binary is not available for download from GnuPG site.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users