Re: Optimal workflow with GPG signatures from multiple parties

2023-03-06 Thread Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users
On 04/03/2023 17:18, Ave Milia via Gnupg-users wrote: What are some available solutions? How would you suggest to organize the keys? Maybe, there should be some signing server in-place, that the developers sends an artifact to? I built something similar for $WORK. You lock down the signing

Re: Optimal workflow with GPG signatures from multiple parties

2023-03-04 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users
Ave Milia via Gnupg-users wrote: Logically, it probably should not be as simple as the developer deploying their personal public key into the target environment and then signing their artifact, for two reasons: the target environment gets wiped, and it practically cannot account for all

Optimal workflow with GPG signatures from multiple parties

2023-03-04 Thread Ave Milia via Gnupg-users
Hi list, We have a build server, it stores a private key and is capable of signing the resulting build artifact. The artifact then gets verified in the target environment during installation. There are multiple issues with current approach: 1. A random developer cannot trigger a build on the