Hi Bernhard
I eventually changed my mind as I have'nt found out how to extract the
source document from a signed one.
So I decided to procede with detached signatures applied, as you
suggest, on the source documents and not on the crypted ones.
Regarding asymmetric versus symmetric cryptography,
Hi Arbiel,
Am Mittwoch 14 September 2016 17:28:59 schrieb Arbiel (gmx):
> Asymmetric encryption requires the recipients to use my public key to
> get access the documents, whereas symmetric encryption only requires
> them to key in the encryption key.
for decryption, only the private key of the
Message transféré
From: 07 2016 <>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 0080
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Subject: Re: Signing and symmetrically encrypting files
To: Bernhard Reiter
References:
<201609141231.04182.bernh...@intevation.de>
From: Arbiel (gmx)
X-En
Am Dienstag 13 September 2016 18:02:04 schrieb Arbiel Perlacremaz:
> I intend to define a specific password for each one of the groups to
> symmetrically encrypt the documents depending on which group they are
> dedicated to.
Wouldn't it make more sense to use asymmetric encryption
to the groups
