On Saturday 23 January 2010, Chris De Young wrote:
Sven Radde wrote:
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it
desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:34:06 -0300
Faramir Faramir faramir...@gmail.com articulated:
Sven Radde escribió:
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it
desirable.
What about inline
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet use
OpenPGP?
Enigmail, for example, has per-recipient rules that are supposed to
Sven Radde wrote:
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet use
OpenPGP?
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sven Radde escribió:
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet use
Chris De Young wrote:
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I don't care for this approach (I have
considered it) for a couple of reasons. One, it may encourage use of inline
signatures in general...
Unsolicited attachments are considered inappropriate by many.
MacRober
On 01/21/10 05:48, MFPA wrote:
These seem to be fairly rare these days though - or maybe I just don't know
many people who use clients like this.
Outlook Express has that limitation (unless it was fixed in a late
version).
I just did a quick test using Thunderbird 3, enigmail 1, and
* Chris De Young c...@chud.net [100120 15:47]:
Matthew Krotzer wrote:
What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
sure that only a very small minority of my recipients bothers to
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:04:26AM -0500, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
I've recieved enough replies of can't open the attachment you sent
that made me stop signing all my emails. I'm looking for best policy to
say hey, see this gpg stuff? You should look into it so we assure some
degree of privacy
Mark H. Wood wrote:
Oh, yes. My tongue is nearly bitten through from suppressing the urge
to respond, what did you think an 'application/pgp-signature'
attachment is? I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Chris
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 at 8:43:20 PM, you wrote:
Matthew Krotzer wrote:
What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
Matthew Krotzer wrote:
What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
sure that only a very small minority of my recipients bothers to validate the
disgnature, so advertising is actually
On 1/19/10 11:46 PM, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email
signature?
Some email clients (Thunderbird+Enigmail, for instance) let you put a
kind of note to other users hidden in the email headers. These things,
called kludges, are one of the
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 1/19/10 11:46 PM, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email
signature?
Some email clients (Thunderbird+Enigmail, for instance) let you put a
kind of note to other users hidden in the email headers. These things,
14 matches
Mail list logo
