I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
On 27 Jun 2007, at 09:09, Fred Kiefer wrote:
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
License as published
Hi Greg,
thank you for pointing out this problem. I think that in this specific
case the error lies with Gorm. What happens is that the
displayRectIgnoringOpacity: method in GormViewEditor calls the super
implementation of displayIfNeededInRectIgnoringOpacity:. This method on
NSView now calls
Fred,
Thanks for looking into this. I will make some changes and do some tests later
this afternoon to see if it corrects the issue.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GNUstep
Fred,
You were correct. I replaced the call with the one you suggested and it now
works properly. I'm going to test it a bit more to see if there are any other
issues.
Thanks, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John
Hi,
On 2007-06-27 02:23:27 +0200 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best
way
for the project to proceed is to change the license of our
applications
(GWorkspace, Gorm, etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:09:37 +0200, Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General
