Re: Project Center status, or lack thereof...

2007-07-08 Thread Yen-Ju Chen
On 7/7/07, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I would like to get this fixed at some point. PC is one of our core applications and it should work with the latest release, but yet it's not gnustep-make 2.0 compliant which, basically, renders it useless. See this comment:

Re: Project Center status, or lack thereof...

2007-07-08 Thread Gregory John Casamento
I believe that this is worth looking into at this point. -- Gregory Casamento - Original Message From: Yen-Ju Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GNUstep Developers gnustep-dev@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2007 1:03:21 PM Subject: Re: Project Center

Re: Project Center status, or lack thereof...

2007-07-08 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I would love to see more work being done on PM (either by me, or others), since I haven't had much motivation lately (nobody used it, at least not that I would know...). Integration into the GNUstep project itself is a problematic issue. I have

Re: Project Center status, or lack thereof...

2007-07-08 Thread Yen-Ju Chen
On 7/8/07, Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I would love to see more work being done on PM (either by me, or others), since I haven't had much motivation lately (nobody used it, at least not that I would know...). Integration into the

Re: Project Center status, or lack thereof...

2007-07-08 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Saso, I believe that the FSF has copyright assignments available for many different countries to deal with the local laws in each. I won't touch the debate on the GPLv3 issue at this time, as I know it's a sensitive issue for some and that's not the point of this discussion. :) I haven't