gsweb on amd64

2008-03-03 Thread David Wetzel
(my original CC: did not work) Hi folks, I just compiled one of my web apps for NetBSD 4.0/amd64 Everything seems to work so far :) I did not try gdl2, but my own simple DB layer just works... Dave ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: Next release

2008-03-03 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:51:01 +0100, Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi, On 2008-03-02 00:18:47 +0100 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's time for another release. I'll make an unstable release of the core libraries late next week. I also plan a stable base release, but I will not

gnustep on windows

2008-03-03 Thread Paul Fox
Ok, I've downloaded the patch and worked on merging the changes in CairoContext.m with the latest version (so pdf and ps output would still work) as well as cleaning up a few minor style things. It now compiles, but I get garbage when I try to run Gorm, and the GNUstep test appears to freeze.

Re: gnustep on windows

2008-03-03 Thread Paul Fox
I just made some small changes in CairoContext.m The zip file has been updated : http://amstradstuff.free.fr/GNUstep/back-win32cairo.zip Oops... looks like someone beat me to the punch. Great minds think alike, eh? At any rate, I showed my results, and they aren't ideal. Does anyone have

Re: Next release

2008-03-03 Thread Hubert Chathi
Stefan Bidigaray wrote: Debian Unstable (Sid) tends to only track stable packages of anything! The so called unstable Debian branch is just unstable due to package problems, but the packages in it are generally the latest stable (assuming there's someone maintaining them). Yes, that is

Re: gnustep on windows

2008-03-03 Thread Fred Kiefer
Xavier Glattard wrote: I just made some small changes in CairoContext.m The zip file has been updated : http://amstradstuff.free.fr/GNUstep/back-win32cairo.zip Cairo backend and Cairo/Glitz backend can be build and run. With Calculator and Gorm: Cairo backend : Text is Ok. Most

Re: gnustep on windows

2008-03-03 Thread Fred Kiefer
Christopher Armstrong wrote: Hi Paul Thought I'd chime in on the conversation :-). When programming with GNUstep you will be working against the GNUstep drawing API, not cairo or GDI. It is true that the implementation of this API for cairo is more complete, but even that may be changed.

Re: Next release

2008-03-03 Thread Riccardo
Hi, On 2008-03-02 21:00:53 +0100 Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Debian currently tracks the stable branch. My understanding was that the purpose for stable was to provide a stable ABI for application developers to target. But I'm hearing more about applications that need the

Summer of Code 2008

2008-03-03 Thread Fred Kiefer
I just noticed that application for Google's Summer of Code started today. We have until 12th of March to submit our application as mentoring organization. I am not saying that we have to, the result from the projects last year were a bit below of what we expected. On the other hand, in the end

Re: Summer of Code 2008

2008-03-03 Thread Gregory John Casamento
I think SoC would be a good thing to get into this year. We need to gain momentum and SoC is a good way to get the word out as well as get some people interested in GNUstep. Later, GJC -- Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer - Original

Re: GNUstep-make and C++ projects...

2008-03-03 Thread Nicola Pero
It would be nice if gnustep-make was to automatically do all of this. Not that sure how to decide when to use C++ linking (is it when only CC_FILES are non-empty and all the other xxx_FILES are empty ?) and how to best automate it. Suggestions from C++ users are welcome. Wouldn't

Re: GNUstep-make and C++ projects...

2008-03-03 Thread Tim McIntosh
On Mar 3, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Nicola Pero wrote: PS: The variables used to specify C++ and ObjC++ flags in gnustep- make are currently called CCFLAGS and OBJCCFLAGS (eg, ADDITIONAL_CCFLAGS, etc), not CXXFLAGS and OBJCXXFLAGS. Not sure why. If CXXFLAGS and OBJCXXFLAGS are more natural to C++

Re: Next release

2008-03-03 Thread Adam Fedor
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Hubert Chathi wrote: I was intending on tracking the GNUstep unstable branch in Debian experimental, but we currently have some unresolved issues regarding ffcall/libffi. I think tracking unstable would be a good idea. Are you having general problems with

Re: Next release

2008-03-03 Thread Adam Fedor
On Mar 3, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Riccardo wrote: A newer stable release should be done indeed. Adam? That's up to Gregory, et. al. Do we have any goals for the next stable release? gui 1.0? That last stable release, I didn't start backporting patches until six months afterwards, when it

Re: gnustep on windows

2008-03-03 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 3 Mar 2008, at 23:41, Christopher Armstrong wrote: Hi Fred On 04/03/2008, at 7:06 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Just one comment on this impressive patch. You seem to override some system colour methods on NSColor to use the Windows colour settings in GNUstep. This is the wrong approach to do