Hubert Chathi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at applying for Google's SOC this year. I'm interested in
looking at GNU/Linux desktop integration issues. So I'd like to look
at:
- the window focusing issues, and making GNUstep work well in all window
managers
- looking at which
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be updated when the value of the
2nd one
Maybe we could add the flag only when compiling GSObjCRuntime.m ?
After all, that file is the only file
which should access the runtime internals directly ? :-)
Something like the following (added to the GNUmakefile) should do it
ifneq ($(OBJC_RUNTIME_LIB), gnu)
GSObjCRuntime.m_FILE_FLAGS
Selon Fred Kiefer fredkiefer at gmx.de:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st field to
the 2nd one :
Selon Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be
Selon Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
You do understand that the binding behaviour is not symmetrical?
May be i don't...
I get the
Selon Fred Kiefer fredkiefer at gmx.de:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st field to
the 2nd one :
Selon Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be
ups. sorry for the multiple double posts (!)
i thought some of them were lost :-/
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes for
Binding. They have to be finished. Are you going to be using these in
Renaissance? Do you currently use the existing connector classes?
Mostly curious. :)
GJC
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
#
Selon Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes for
Binding. They have to be finished. Are you going to be using these in
Renaissance? Do you currently use the existing connector classes?
Mostly curious. :)
GJC
Aren't you effectively writing code when you create the XML by hand?
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
- Original Message
From: Xavier Glattard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Xavier Glattard [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
