Hello David
I would like to plan a GDL2 release for Lenny. I'm not sure what the
exact deadlines are but they are approaching. Some of the GDL2
prerequisites are
I've got an approximate deadline for Lenny here:
http://asdfasdf.ethz.ch/~tar/bts/
Days until Lenny release (15 September 2008)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on David's email, It's been over a year since we last
branched a stable release. Should we try to do another one soon?
I'm looking forward for a new stable release...
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 5 Jun 2008, at 20:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on David's email, It's been over a year since we last
branched a stable release. Should we try to do another one soon?
I guess so.
I really wanted to get base much more compatible with the latest
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I would like to know which versions (stable/unstable) are to be expected
for Lenny so that I can match/remove some of the workarounds and hacks
needed.
If we manage to make new and non memory leaking
(timemon.app+gnustep-gui, right bheron?) tarball releases and Hubert can
This method should get called from the user interface to determine
whether an item is to be enabled or disabled. This currently doesn't
happen in GNUstep (as far as I know). What should happen inside this
method is that the object checks whether the action of the item is
currently applicable
I believe we should shoot for this, yes. So you think we should target the
end of the month to make the release?
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Hi,
Is it ok if I apply this little patch ? It simply enclose the methods
summary and the abstract in divs, so you can style them. Any reason
why the css include line 1119 is disabled ?
thanks,
--
Nicolas Roard
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound
they make as they fly by. -- Douglas
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I would like to know which versions (stable/unstable) are to be expected
for Lenny so that I can match/remove some of the workarounds and hacks
needed.
If we manage to make new and non memory leaking
(timemon.app+gnustep-gui, right bheron?) tarball
On 6 Jun 2008, at 09:05, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 5 Jun 2008, at 20:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on David's email, It's been over a year since we last
branched a stable release. Should we try to do another one soon?
I guess so.
I really wanted to get
Hi,
There is one thing I should do before a new back release, that is
test with cairo 1.6.4 to see how to avoid the black bars that have
been reported. I hope to do this on the weekend, after that a release
should be possible.
Just one more question: Are we all confident that the big changes
В Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:17:10 -0700, Gregory John Casamento написа:
So you think we should target the end of the month to make the release?
It would be too late for Debian, I'm afraid. According to [1] all
libraries will be frozen at the end of this month. Of course we could
always ask the
On 6/6/08, Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 5 Jun 2008, at 20:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on David's email, It's been over a year since we last
branched a stable release. Should we try to do another one soon?
I guess so.
I really wanted
I'm not sure, but I defer to Fred's judgement entirely on this.
But my opinion is that If we do deprecate it, it should not be removed for a
while. The reason is that the xlib/x11 backend is a good fallback position to
have when all else fails. Additionally, on older machines, the xlib
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Until the LGPL3/GPL2 issue is resolved, those are the latest
versions that we can have in Debian, or else we'd have to get rid of
Terminal.app (and a few other packages) from Debian.
It's a judgement call. IMVHO we should not hold a major GNUstep
update just for this,
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I would like to know which versions (stable/unstable) are to be
expected
for Lenny so that I can match/remove some of the workarounds and hacks
needed.
If we manage to make new and non memory leaking
(timemon.app+gnustep-gui,
I would prefer not to deprecate xlib. There still are environments where
it is better working then the cairo backend. For the moment I would
still recomment art as the standard backend while still planing to have
cairo as the main backend for the future. The cairo library is still
changing too
Matt Rice wrote:
I did notice an NSTableView bug though, and its reproducable afaict
with any editable tableview if you edit a field after editing its row
never set as needing display, you have to click a row to get things to
redraw.
Matt,
I did not quite understand this description (Did you
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Perhaps we should take a quick poll.
This is an excellent idea, but how do you expect to do it? The lists
this discussion is being carried on have limited audience. Of course
the opinion of the gnustep-dev subscribers is valuable, and that of
the main GNUstep maintainers
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I would like to know which versions (stable/unstable) are to be
expected
for Lenny so that I can match/remove some of the workarounds and hacks
needed.
If we manage to make new and non memory leaking
Hi,
Can we officially deprecate the x11 back end in this release and
recommend
Cairo? The OpenBSD package, for example, uses the x11 back end and
I don't
think this gives people the best impression of GNUstep. I've been
using
Cairo since AlpenStep last year and after Fred fixed a
20 matches
Mail list logo
