Adam Fedor wrote:
On Nov 11, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
Anyone object if I make a 1.16.4 stable release of the base library to
make recent bugfixes available (and perhaps a 1.17.1 unstable release
too, so make sure the latest unstable release has all the fixes of the
On Nov 11, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Could a stable gui release please wait for another week? I am again
working on the view bounds rotation/translation issue once more and
this
time it looks like I am making some progress. I would like to commit
my
first change set today and
Am 11.11.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Roland Schwingel:
Hi...
As already announced some days ago I will now start to submit the
patches for GNUstep base/libobjc to be working natively on 64bit
windows.
This first patch submitted (patch #6668) in savannah's patch
manager covers the libobjc
I submitted my test for the @synchronize changes. Nothing from my end should
hold up a release.
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
From: Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Developer
On Nov 11, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
Anyone object if I make a 1.16.4 stable release of the base library
to make recent bugfixes available (and perhaps a 1.17.1 unstable
release too, so make sure the latest unstable release has all the
fixes of the latest stable
Anyone object if I make a 1.16.4 stable release of the base library to
make recent bugfixes available (and perhaps a 1.17.1 unstable release
too, so make sure the latest unstable release has all the fixes of the
latest stable release)?
Is there anything this should be waiting for?
Hi...
As already announced some days ago I will now start to submit the
patches for GNUstep base/libobjc to be working natively on 64bit windows.
This first patch submitted (patch #6668) in savannah's patch manager
covers the libobjc runtime. It is basically fixing gcc 4.4 warnings and
only
