GNUstep Testfarm Results

2008-12-07 Thread Adam Fedor
Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results

2008-12-07 Thread Fred Kiefer
Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results

2008-12-07 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer From: Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Developer GNUstep

Re: GNUstep on DirectFB

2008-12-07 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi Christopher, On 2008-12-07 00:52:06 +0100 Lisbon Acid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if this has been implemented before or not, I know it has been talked about, but over the past three days I've thrown together a hacked up backend for GNUstep running through DirectFB. It is

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results

2008-12-07 Thread Adam Fedor
I fixed that also. On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org