Re: Git migration nearly complete

> On Jun 11, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Ivan Vučica wrote: > > - long-standing contributors who've had commit access before should > send Gregory or me their Github username, so they can be added to the > gnustep org Hi Ivan, My GitHub account is adam.fe...@gmail.com

Re: 32bit GS on 64bit Win rebuild base from src

> On Aug 15, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Giah de Barag wrote: > > > Question: What version of gcc built gnustep-core-0.35.0-setup.exe? > gcc 4.6.1___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: 32bit GS on 64bit Win rebuild base from src

> On Aug 14, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Giah de Barag wrote: > > I’m trying to update 0.35 installer’s gdb > > mingw-get.exe: *** WARNING *** c:\msys\var/lib/mingw-get/data/profile.xml: > user configuration file missing > mingw-get.exe: *** INFO ***

Re: 32bit GS on 64bit Win rebuild base from src

> On Aug 14, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Riccardo Mottola > wrote: > > > But if Giah uses the msys you supply, it should have the same libffi you > used, so I do not understand. > > Do you use any special flags to make or base? No I don’t, except perhaps

Re: XML Property List code in GNUstep Base

On Jul 14, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com wrote: A XML plist parser does not need to be a full XML parser, and can skip the DTD validation altogether (which is what I plan on doing in CoreBase). The format is brain-dead simple and a XML

Fwd: Mirrors for GNU step

FYI, Begin forwarded message: Date: March 25, 2015 at 4:03:44 PM GMT-7 From: ray sison ray.si...@go-parts.com To: webmast...@gnustep.org Subject: Mirrors for GNU step Hello , My name is Ray Sison, and I'm with Go-Parts.com. I'm writing to ask if you would be interested in hosting

Re: ★ GNUstep dev, Neue Nachricht von Armin

On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Ivan Vučica i...@vucica.net wrote: Do we have a way of blocking the @badoo.com domain from spamming our mailing lists? I added the address to the banned list. Hopefully it works. Adam signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Fwd: gnustep licensing issue

This came to the webmaster list. Is anyone in a position to provide an answer for them? Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Smith petersmith0...@gmail.com Subject: gnustep licensing issue Date: February 21, 2014 at 6:27:19 AM MST To: gnustep-webmast...@gnu.org, Mike Thompson

Re: gnustep licensing issue

and LGPL are both distribution licenses - if they are just allowing people to use it remotely without distributing the code or the resulting software then there are no requirements to do anything. David On 21 Feb 2014, at 15:00, Adam Fedor fe...@gnu.org wrote: This came

Re: GNUstep packages for Windows from www.gnustep.org

I do. The link is provided on the Windows Installer page in the Developers section: http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/tools/installers/trunk/nsis On Jan 11, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Marcus Müller z...@mulle-kybernetik.com wrote: Hi, who created the GNUstep installer packages for Windows, available

Re: Wiki (was Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal)

On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote: I see the lack of wiki usage. I see outdated infos there, but can't fix it for the lack of privileges. It's easy to get privileges. Just send your account name to gnustep-webmasters at gnu.org and we'll give you write

Re: Update to webpage

On Dec 27, 2013, at 5:08 AM, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote: The main link for GNUstep installation on our wiki leads to this page: http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/User/GNUstep/gnustep-howto_toc.html It is from 2008 and partly outdated. It also misses all the

Re: Windows installers

On Sep 29, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Germán Arias germanan...@gmx.es wrote: Could be possible update the Windows installers? Or there are instructions at some place about how make these? You can get instructions and files to build the installer here:

Re: GNUstep CoreData

On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Muhammad Hussein Nasrollahpour iapplechocol...@me.com wrote: Hi there, I filled the copyright assignment and sent it but they didn't accept my request because I'm from Iran and they told me that US counsel prevented us to accept assignments from Iran. Any

Re: ***JUNK MAIL*** FW: libobjc compile issue on mingw

I finally had some time to work on this and have got (perhaps) a little farther (I compiled with clang, although I get similar errors with gcc). I still these errors: h:/Source/nsis/sources/gstep-current/svn-libobjc2/block_trampolines.S:113: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized

Re: __NSCF** classes and libobjc2 dependency on C++ runtime

On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:40 PM, Luboš Doležel wrote: With that being said, what are the conditions for getting commit access to GNUstep's repo? I'd like to push my work on TFB into upstream, so that no work would go to waste. Given the current state of TFB in CoreBase, I suppose I certainly

Re: open source but closed community?

On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Manuel Guesdon wrote: Actually mails to webmas...@gnustep.org are rejected with this reason: 550 User Unknown - Please use webmast...@gnustep.org to contact webmasters webmast...@gnustep.org is forwarded to MJ Ray email. Forwarding to

Re: open source but closed community?

On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: I'm afraid I don't know who administers the wiki I asked for, and got, write access quite quickly, but that was several years ago. It's possible that the administrator is no longer very active (or possibly your email just

Re: open source but closed community?

On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Riccardo Mottola wrote: It appears the webmast...@gnustep.org mail address is not working anymore. I will update the webpages to point to the main address: gnustep-webmast...@gnu.org that's a small, but nasty and bad-looking mistake. Can we make one a

Re: GNUstep Code Freeze

Should I go ahead with the gui/back release? On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Friday should be fine, as long as no show stopper bugs turn up till then. On 01.02.2012 19:47, Adam Fedor wrote: I can't do Saturday. Friday or Sunday would be best. On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:05 AM

Re: GNUstep Code Freeze

On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Adam, are you willing to prepare this release again? I can make a release anytime ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Re: gnustep-howto documentation update

I thought I was updating it, but it turns out there was a bug in make that didn't install the html chapters. It should be fixed now though. Plus I updated all the documentation. On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: Hi, I committed some changes to the gnustep-howto.texi

Re: gnustep announcements on info-gnu too

On Aug 6, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Karl Berry wrote: Hi folks -- I wonder if I could ask you to cc your announcements of new official gnustep-related releases to info-...@gnu.org. Could only help find new users or contributors, I hope. (Announcements of test releases should stay just on

Re: Policy for updating ANNOUNCE file

That would definitely be nice. When I make a release, I have to scroll through the ChangeLog and look for commits that look important so I can fill all that out. FYI, we update two files: Documentation/news.texi Documentstaion/ReleaseNotes.gsdoc news.texi gets folded into the ANNOUNCE file,

Re: New release tagged

The standard ANNOUNCE file that I use is in the top level directory in SVN, but I don't have any pictures. On Apr 14, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Chisnall wrote: On 14 Apr 2011, at 10:00, Fred Kiefer wrote: On 14.04.2011 05:06, Adam Fedor wrote: FYI, I've tagged the new release of the core

New release tagged

FYI, I've tagged the new release of the core libraries so feel free to commit patches to the trunk again. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Re: GNUstep, Google Summer of Code, and an idea

On Mar 21, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: On 20.03.2011 20:46, Denis Washington wrote: I have seen that the GNU project has been accepted for this year's Google Summer of Code, but the ideas list does not list anything related to GNUstep. Does that mean that the GNUstep project will

Re: Next GNUstep release

On Mar 7, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: GNUstep base is making excellent progress in the moment, still I would suggest that we keep to our original plan of making a new release soon. For this we would need a few days of code freeze to allow for testing of a stable code base. What

Re: [Gnustep-cvs] r32353 - /libs/gui/trunk/Model/IMLoading.m

On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Am 24.02.2011 14:34, schrieb David Chisnall: Author: theraven Date: Thu Feb 24 14:34:21 2011 New Revision: 32353 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=32353view=rev Log: Add __attribute__((unused)) on __dummyFunctionForLinking().

Re: gnustep-testfarm stopped working

I On Nov 21, 2010, at 3:02 AM, Philippe Roussel wrote: So it creates /home/philou/gnustep-woody/share/GNUstep/Makefiles and then looks for /home/philou/gnustep-woody/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh. I'm not sure why this is happening. Perhaps you should just completely remove

Re: Clarification of license information on gnustep-example

On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I the owner of the GNUstep feature in the Fedora project and have started to packaging the gnustep-example package. During the Review I have recorgnise, that there is a verbatin

Re: Next GNUstep release?

OK, I'll make a gui/back release early tomorrow. On May 9, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Richard made a final change that allows us to continue doing a gui/back release. At least as far as I know, we have less known issues then for previous releases.

Re: Next GNUstep release?

I plan on making a release of make and base by tomorrow. Please let me know when I can make a release of gui/back as well. On May 4, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote: Fred, I'm still trying to reproduce it, but even so I don't believe it's a problem with GUI or anything that

Re: Next GNUstep release?

On May 4, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Thank you for the bug report. For me this isn't a show stopper for the next GNUstep release. It only affects Windows and mostly the WinUX theme. It may be a show stopper for that theme, but we already decided not to make it the default theme

Re: Compilation error on Solaris...

On Apr 27, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote: Compiling file NSFormCell.m ... Compiling file NSGraphicsContext.m ... NSGraphicsContext.m: In function 'GSCurrentContext': NSGraphicsContext.m:100: warning: instance variable '_gcontext' is @private; this will be a hard error in the

Google Summer of Code

I'd like to congratulate our two students (Niels and Eric) who were accepted for projects under the GNU project. Their proposals even ended up being the top 2 picks for GNU! Hopefully we can all help make their projects a success by supporting the students and their mentors (Fred and David) and

Re: Compilation error on Solaris...

On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote: I would still consider this a bug, albeit a minor one. Also, with the version of GCC I'm using, gcc 4.3.x, I'm getting a message about missing stdint.h. It's been a while since I built on Solaris, so I'm not sure if this is expected.

Re: Attempted GORM build on GNUstep/Windows (was: Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: l...@test ~/gorm/trunk $ make make install This is gnustep-make 2.2.0. Type 'make print-gnustep-make-help' for help. /GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/aggregate.make:48:

Re: Attempted GORM build on GNUstep/Windows (was: Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: l...@test ~/gorm/trunk $ make make install This is gnustep-make 2.2.0. Type 'make print-gnustep-make-help' for help. /GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/aggregate.make:48:

Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?

On Apr 20, 2010, at 6:02 AM, David Chisnall wrote: I don't think the problem is the explanation, it's that -core and -system seem to be meaningless names. Maybe renaming -system to either -dependencies or -development would make sense? Neither of those make sense to me though. -system

Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?

On Apr 17, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote: I'd, personally, like to get this to a point where we can release with the Windows theme as the default on Windows. Since so much work has gone into the theme, it seems best to put it out there so that people can see it and see that

Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?

On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Am 19.04.2010 17:38, schrieb Adam Fedor: Seems to I a great solution to the problem. Perhaps we should also state there, why we don't make it the default (some applications wont work with that setting, as far as I understand) and how

Re: Which bugs to focus on for the release?

On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:12 PM, David Chisnall wrote: While we're changing things, maybe we could change the name of the Windows installers too. After reading the descriptions, I'm still not clear what -system and -core mean in the context of GNUstep, which one I should install, and if I

Re: Next GNUstep release?

On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Adam, could you once more take up the task of releasing GNUstep? We should give it another week or two so that people can complain about existing bugs that need to be fixed before the release. I'll help make a release whenever it's

Re: Corrupted heap

On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Vincent Richomme wrote: /* Return YES if this looks like a JPEG. */ + (BOOL) _bitmapIsJPEG: (NSData *)imageData { struct jpeg_decompress_struct cinfo; ... BLABLA ... // establish return context for error handling if (setjmp(jerrMgr.setjmpBuffer))

Re: My first app

On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Vincent Richomme wrote: Ok so now I really would like to play with your GNUstep baby, I have compiled winlib and cairo backend : $ ./configure --prefix=/GNUstep --enable-server=win32 --enable-graphics=winlib --with-name=winlib $ make

Re: My first app

On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Adam Fedor wrote: You have two different backends, with names that are different from the default backend name (--with-name), so you have to tell GNUstep which one to use. Try something like this: defaults write NSGlobalDomain GSBackend cairo Err, also

Re: wiki write access

On Mar 13, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: Hi, could I have wiki write access please? My username is ericwa. I tried emailing webmast...@gnustep.org as it says on the wiki but my messages bounced. You're set now. We're having problems with webmasters as gnu.org has declared

Re: GSoC application

David , or anyone - I need a Link ID, which I presume is related to your google account, for the application. A backup admin is required. I need to submit this very very soon!!! ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: Updated windows installer gnustep-system-0.24.1

On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Vincent Richomme wrote: You can find the new package here : http://www.smartmobili.com/Downloads/gnustep-system-0.24.1-setup.exe and the nsis script here: http://www.smartmobili.com/Downloads/gnustep-system.nsi I really encourage you to make some diff between

Re: problem about writeInBackgroundAndNotify

Unless there has been a binary incompatible change to the library since the last release (which there has not, as far as I know), you can just get the latest base library from SVN (see: http://www.gnustep.org/resources/sources.html) or from the daily-snapshots and compile and install it:

Re: New gui/back release?

On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: I am currently going through old mails that I marked as needing more attention to see if there is any other fix that should go in. Fred I'm ready to make a release anytime you'd like.___ Gnustep-dev

Re: Success with GNUstep installer on Windows 7 64-bit

On Jul 26, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: Hi, I just wanted to report that I tested the GNUstep Windows installer version 0.23.0 on Windows 7 64-bit, and it worked fine. I was able to compile and run SystemPreferences.app. So, the comment on

Re: New gui/back release?

On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Gregory Casamento schrieb: I have stubbed out the ivar and it's methods. This should have no impact since no one is actually using the attachedSheet method. I'll put it back in once we have done the release. Great, this should make us ready

Re: Memory Management

On Jul 13, 2009, at 9:01 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I'm debugging the NSSound stuff and have run into a bit of a problem with memory management and the whole RETAIN/RELEASE stuff... I'm sure my probably has do to with being a novice. Anyway, in the -dealloc method of NSSound I call

Re: New gui/back release?

On Jul 11, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: As we are about to the the big change to NSSound from Stefan Bidigaray and new code tends to need a few weeks to get most of the bugs out, I'd like to propose that we release a new version of gui and back before that. There already a quite a

Re: GNUstep tarball archive

On Jul 10, 2009, at 7:19 AM, Atanas Bombov wrote: Hi everyone, I am looking for older (pre- 0.12 and 1.12) versions of the core libraries, is there a place where the old versions are being kept? I couldn't find them on the main site... I don't know if anyone has kept those, but you can

Re: Submitting big patch

You have a copyright assignment already. It would be easier if we just gave you write access to the repository and you did it yourself. I could help with configure.ac if you give me an idea of what needs to be done. On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:22 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I'm getting ready

Re: Checking out modules/core

On Jun 28, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I'm getting this error when checking out from svn: stefan-test:/usr/src# svn co svn://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/modules/ core You should probable use: svn co http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/modules/core for a read-only repository, and

Re: Checking out modules/core

to http://svn.gna.org. On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Adam Fedor fe...@qwestoffice.net wrote: On Jun 28, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I'm getting this error when checking out from svn: stefan-test:/usr/src# svn co svn://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/modules/ core You should probable

Re: Checking out modules/core

On Jun 28, 2009, at 5:26 PM, David Chisnall wrote: On 29 Jun 2009, at 00:20, Adam Fedor wrote: I don't get that problem, so it might be something with your connectivity, or perhaps it is being blocked somehow. You don't get this error because you have an ssh key registered with GNA

Re: Build error on Windows...

On May 25, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote: Making all for subproject gsc... Compiling file gscolors.c ... Compiling file GSGState.m ... Compiling file GSStreamContext.m ... Compiling file GSStreamGState.m ... Linking subproject gsc ... Making all for subproject win32...

Re: Next release

On May 8, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Nicola Pero wrote: On 7 May 2009, at 15:26, Adam Fedor wrote: I can make a release of the core libraries in the next day or two if that's OK. This was my plan: make 2.0.9 I was thinking of releasing trunk as make 2.2.0 (instead of 2.0.9). The idea being

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Testfarm failure. See http://www.gnustep.org/developers/testfarm.html Constellation Fail Compile i386-apple-darwin9.6.0 Tue Apr 14 12:26:11 EDT 2009 angada Success Compile i386-unknown-freebsd7.2 Wed Apr 15 15:36:28 CST 2009 defiant Fail Compile unknown Tue Apr 14 12:26:15 EDT 2009 magento Fail

Next release

It's been a long time now (LTN) since our last release, perhaps we should do a new one soon? Also, in an effort to please everyone (ETPE), I was thinking we should separate the release numbering from the SO version numbering, at least on the unstable branch as long as there are no ABI

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Testfarm failure. See http://www.gnustep.org/developer/testfarm.html bear-apple Fail Compile i386-apple-darwin9.6.0 Mon Apr 13 12:24:32 MDT 2009 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Apr 3 06:34:16 EDT 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Apr 2 06:34:14 EDT 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Mar 31 06:34:14 EDT 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: [Urgent] GNUstep at Google Summer of Code'2009

On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:46 AM, David Chisnall wrote: Did we get any feedback on why our application was rejected? It seems odd that GNUstep would be accepted two years in a row and then the combined application would be rejected. Nope. I don't know why, other than they generally

Re: [Urgent] GNUstep at Google Summer of Code'2009

On Mar 18, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Jesse Ross wrote: On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: Unfortunately, it looks like GNUstep (and Étoilé) were not accepted this year :( http://socghop.appspot.com/program/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2009 Can GNUstep be considered as a part of the

Re: ABI Compatibility (was Re: Installation woes for the average user...)

On Mar 12, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: I think you misunderstood. As a GNUstep user and distro maintainer of GNUstep packages, I don't mind if the GNUstep developers break the ABI as much as they want (of course, the less the better). But only bump the soname of a library when

Re: [Urgent] GNUstep at Google Summer of Code'2009

On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Xavier Glattard wrote: I don't know what are the requirements for mentors, but I would be glad to help and take care of one small project :) FYI, some info on Google's SoC: http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html Being a mentor involves working

Re: [Urgent] GNUstep at Google Summer of Code'2009

On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:05 AM, Quentin Mathé wrote: Great, thanks Adam :-) I just reorganized the GNUstep SoC page a bit by dividing Ideas into four project-specific sections: http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Summer_Of_Code_2009 The SoC page mentions Opengroupware as participating with

Re: [Urgent] GNUstep at Google Summer of Code'2009

On Mar 8, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Quentin Mathé wrote: Also who is going to be in charge of the joint application? Someone from GNUstep? That sounds likely since it's the umbrella project for the application. I applied for GNUstep last year, so I could do that.

Re: Allowing Applications to continue after exception...

On Feb 4, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote: I definitely think we should implement something similar. It would help a great deal with some porting efforts. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote: On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Feb 1 06:34:09 EST 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Jan 23 06:34:09 EST 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Jan 12 06:34:13 EST 2009 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: our Devroom - what do we want to do there - call for papers

On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: Sure, we can go and talk to Leslie. What happened with our students ? Thanks We had three. One dropped out before the start even, I think due to family problems. One basically did not submit code that was anywhere near done.

Re: gnustep-make 2.0.8

On Jan 6, 2009, at 2:20 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: I think we need a gnustep-make 2.0.8. The 2.0.7 release has this nasty bug where it fails on gnustep-base's automatic reconfigure - which would cause a lot of confusion for already confused users. We just need to make a 2.0.8 gnustep-make

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 28 06:34:11 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: CYGWIN Problems

On Dec 24, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Darryl Agostinelli wrote: 2) gnustep-startup-0.20.1 has this progressive_mode problem with libJpeg. I see that gnustep-gui-0.16.0 doesn't have that problem, but it's not in gnustep-startup-0.20.1. 3) So I tried to fake out gnustep-startup-0.20.1, by putting

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results

I fixed that also. On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Dec 6 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Dec 5 06:34:11 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Dec 4 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Dec 3 06:34:11 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Nov 24 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: GNUstep base version number

On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: PS: What about doing the gui release? That way we can force everybody to recompile :-) And I would like to see Wolfgang's great patches out and getting used. Should I make a release? I was wondering if there had been any more issues with

Re: daily snapshots

On Nov 18, 2008, at 2:44 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: On 18 Nov 2008, at 09:33, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Hey Richard, I just downloaded the dev-libs daily snaphost (I am at the office, I have only windows and no svn...) and noticed that webserviecs is not included. Is it

Re: Time for a new stable release of base?

On Nov 11, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Could a stable gui release please wait for another week? I am again working on the view bounds rotation/translation issue once more and this time it looks like I am making some progress. I would like to commit my first change set today and

Re: Time for a new stable release of base?

On Nov 11, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: Anyone object if I make a 1.16.4 stable release of the base library to make recent bugfixes available (and perhaps a 1.17.1 unstable release too, so make sure the latest unstable release has all the fixes of the latest stable

Re: ./test-gnustep: i686-pc-linux-gnu-logs.tar.gz: No such file or directory

It is sort of dumb script. First it removes any old logs that might be there, then if (and only if) there is a new log, it moves it to the proper location. If ftp complains that there is no log file, that means that nothing bad happenned during the compile. On Nov 4, 2008, at 4:37 PM,

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Nov 2 06:34:12 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Oct 24 06:34:10 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Re: Problem in compilation

You also need to include the proper libraries and include files. It's easier to do this using the GNUstep makefile system. See these links for some tutorials http://www.gnustep.it/nicola/Tutorials/WritingMakefiles/ http://www.gnustep.org/developers/documentation.html On Oct 16, 2008,

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Sep 23 06:34:10 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

GNUstep Testfarm Results

Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Sep 22 06:34:08 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >