Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
Am I doing this wrong ... should we be keeping trunk at the version
number of the last unstable subminor release until we are ready to
do a new unstable release, or should it be at the expected version
of the next unstable release?
I do not really care
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I temporarily took it back to 1.15.4 to make a release on the
unstable branch because we just haven't done the development work
to produce a new unstable branch yet (ie the big, breaking binary
compatibility significantly, changes listed as 'to do' in the
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
PS: What about doing the gui release? That way we can force
everybody to
recompile :-) And I would like to see Wolfgang's great patches out and
getting used.
Should I make a release? I was wondering if there had been any more
issues with
From: Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Developer GNUstep gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:55:00 PM
Subject: Re: GNUstep base version number
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
PS: What about doing the gui release? That way we can force everybody to
recompile
On 24 Nov 2008, at 23:53, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I temporarily took it back to 1.15.4 to make a release on the
unstable branch because we just haven't done the development work
to produce a new unstable branch yet (ie the big, breaking binary
compatibility
Perhaps that sentence was buried down to low in my last mail:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Looks like somebody downgraded GNUstep base from 1.17 to 1.15.4. Was
this done on purpose?
This unexpected release number change is causing problems to everbody
compiling GNUstep from SVN trunk. Of course it is
