On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
I am going to start reviewing those parts of GNUstep that I am a
direct contributor to for movement to the GPLv3 or LGPLv3 where
appropriate, namely gnustep-gui and Gorm. Fred, please help me
look at gui for any issues
On 7/18/07, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
I am going to start reviewing those parts of GNUstep that I am a
direct contributor to for movement to the GPLv3 or LGPLv3 where
appropriate, namely gnustep-gui and Gorm.
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Status of back
==
Tools
-
font_cacher LGPL2 and includes directly a file with LGPL2
Is the included file that is LGPL2 assigned to the FSF?
Yes, this is a compile time copy of a file used in the xlib backend. No
problem when we leave
Message
From: Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GNUstep Developers gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:18:17 AM
Subject: Re: Moving to GPLv3
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Status of back
==
Tools
-
font_cacher
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
I am going to start reviewing those parts of GNUstep that I am a direct
contributor to for movement to the GPLv3 or LGPLv3 where appropriate, namely
gnustep-gui and Gorm. Fred, please help me look at gui for any issues
regarding this move. I believe
Casamento
- Original Message
From: Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GNUstep Developers gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:58:48 AM
Subject: Re: Moving to GPLv3
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
I am going to start
On Jul 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
My suggestion would be to put everything in gui and back into LPGL
even
tools and bundles. This will make the reuse of code a lot easier.
I would like to see what the other maintainers say with respect to
doing this before making
