Re: Serials Review Interview

1998-10-15 Thread Thomas Krichel
Mark Doyle notes I don't think the econ one was kept current at all and it was never brougt back under the central server. It is still operates, and it is still the one archive that will give your papers the largest exposure. But you can repeat that to authors as many times as you

Re: PDF vs Markup Languages

1998-10-15 Thread Mark Doyle
Hi, On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Tony Barry wrote: At 11:24 AM 1998/10/14, Selmer Bringsjord wrote: I would like to see Tex become the standard for this paperless, on-line future. Nothing else makes sense to me. My money's on XML http://www.w3.org/XML/ with developments from it like MathML

Re: Serials Review Interview

1998-10-15 Thread Mark Doyle
Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Thomas Krichel wrote: Mark Doyle notes It is still operates, and it is still the one archive that will give your papers the largest exposure. But you can repeat that to authors as many times as you want, they still don't want to upload there. I don't know what the

Continuing the discussion

1998-10-15 Thread Bruce Edmonds
Presumabley this forum will end at some point. So, does anyone know of any alternative forum to continue disucssion. In particular (as a academic publisher of a free e-journal) I would like a forum in which to ask questions of people in a similar position, make collaborations (e.g. for permanent

Re: PDF vs Markup Languages

1998-10-15 Thread Selmer Bringsjord
I've looked at this material on XML; interesting. The info on Math puzzles me, however. Latex - html works pretty darn good, even though the equations are images. (As an example, I offer http://www.rpi.edu/~brings/SELPAP/CT/ct/ct.html.) Starting from raw Latex, I should be able to go