On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I've every confidence in Steven's ability to moderate here, in his
> energy, enthusiasm and contribution to the cause. We have a lot to be
> grateful for.
>
> Reading this thread, it does seem that editorial-style annotations on
> postings ar
I've every confidence in Steven's ability to moderate here, in his
energy, enthusiasm and contribution to the cause. We have a lot to be
grateful for.
Reading this thread, it does seem that editorial-style annotations on
postings are better handled separately. Spam-filtering, editorialising,
and l
Perhaps it's worth just pointing out that the Version of Record is
not necessarily in PDF format
Sally
Sally Morris
Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy)
South House, The Street
Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Tel: +44(0)1903 871286
Fax: +44(0)8701 20
OK. Stevan has my vote.
Jean-Max Noyer
Université de Paris7
Le 9 oct. 08 à 14:09, Ingegerd Rabow a écrit :
My confidence vote for Stevan
Ingegerd Rabow
Lund, Sweden
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-sc
My confidence vote for Stevan
Ingegerd Rabow
Lund, Sweden
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On Behalf
Of Jeffery, KG (Keith)
Sent: den 9 oktober 2008 06:20
To: american-scientist-open-acces
** Apologies for cross-posting**
University of Glasgow announces new Publications Policy
The University of Glasgow is proud to announce a new Publications Policy which
will require authors to deposit the full text of peer reviewed journal articles
and conference proceedings in the University's
This declaration has got swallowed up amongst the c**P that has
polluted this forum in the last days. May I tease out a few strands
of the Brisbane Declaration for readers of the list, as a person who
was at the OAR Conference in Brisbane.
1. The Declaration was adopted on the voices at the C
On 9-Oct-08, at 7:37 AM, Peter D. Mosses wrote:
> Could you clarify the following point:
>
>> 5. At the same time, it was widely recognized that publishers' pdfs
>> ("Versions of Record") were not the preferred version of an article to
>> hold in a repository, primarily because a pdf is a print-b
[ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
And me (on pda travelling)
Prof Keith G Jeffery
-Original Message-
From: "Alma Swan"
To: "american-scientist
