Klaus
I take it then that we agree at least that the German problem (if it exists)
is confined solely to Germany? That seems to be a logical consequence.
Arthur Sale
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[ The following text is in the UTF-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
I agree with Stevan. A simple reading of copyright law in some
countries does imply that if you sign away copyright you
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
The first step of the ÿÿthree step testÿÿ is important ÿÿ the use has
to be a ÿÿspecial caseÿÿ (i.e. not systematic)
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Sally Morris (Morris Associates)
sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
The first step of the 'three step test' is important -
the use has to be a 'special case' (i.e. not systematic)
The non-systematicity is in the author's individual, case-by-case
Re:
Corbyn, Zoë (2009) Conflict of interest warning over
Evidence sale [to Thompson Reuters]. Times Higher
Education Supplement. 22 January 2009
There is indeed not only a potential but an actual conflict of
interest when the party that is comparing and assessing the
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Klaus Graf
klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I have shown
at http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5193609/ the Request
button isn't legal in Germany.
(1) I regret to point out that -- like everyone else in this
discussion -- you have not shown,
2009/2/15 Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
As I have shown at http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5193609/ the Request
button isn't legal in Germany.
I have serious doubts that you have the knowledge to refute my
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 3:01 PM, c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
the deal for the evaluation for the REF Pilot was ALWAYS
only to use Web of Knwledge as the database
That is bad enough news in itself. REF should be test piloting a rich
battery of multiple references, from multiple
Having worked for Thomson companies in the past I can
confirm that Thomson leaves them very much to their own
devices and makes no effort to get them to follow a party
line. In any case, all Evidence is doing is an analysis
of the REF Pilot, not the main REF itself. contracts for
running the
Sorry, but many publishers require assignment, which is
not a licence to publish but complete transfer of the
copyright. Then it IS like selling your house or car!
Moral Rights exist in some countries, but not all. in any
case, if you retain your Moral Rights but have assigned
copyright, you get
[This message was posted on JISC-REPOSITORIES and is reproduced here
on the request of the AMSCI moderator.]
On 15 Feb 2009, at 19:56, Charles Oppenheim wrote on the JISC-
REPOSITORIES mailing list:
I agree that the publisher cannot demand destruction of copies made
PRIOR to the assignment,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Klaus
Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Klaus Graf:
Every one can repeat my little experiment with [the
Button, using] a mail adress not indicating his name or
affiliation OA means: each scholar with internet
access has
Actually a growing number (though still a minority) of publishers either
don't ask for copyright transfer, or - if the author demurs - will provide a
Licence to Publish document instead. John Laura Cox, in their regular
studies for ALPSP, found:
In 2003, 83% of publishers required copyright
[ The following text is in the WINDOWS-1252 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
As ONE illustration of how rights are generally shared between author and
publisher, even with a copyright transfer
14 matches
Mail list logo
