In the Open Knowledge Foundation we have a mailing list for exactly that
purpose and everyone will be very welcome there:
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
We take the view that open access as defined in BBB - declarations is
the appropriate use of the term:
BOAI 2002: By
Dear Florence,
perhaps this might be of interest:
Davis, P. M. (2012). The persistence of error : a study of retracted
articles on the Internet and in personal libraries. Journal of the
Medical Library Association : JMLA, 100(July).
doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.008,
Hi Serge
The open science list at the Open Knowledge Foundation is always happy to
host discussions on innovation in scholarly publishing
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science (600+ members)
Post-publication peer review and open peer review are well within our
interests.
The
Members of this list may be interested in reading a new interview published by
COAR.
The interview is with the Dr. Alejandor Ceccatto, Secretary of Scientific and
Technological Articulation from the Argentinian Ministry of Science, Technology
and Innovation. Dr Ceccatto was responsible for
I wanted to say publicly that I posted the last message from Jeffrey Beall
with regret. Ad hominem remarks are not helpful. Moreover, on mailing lists
they often end up alienating not just the person attacked, but other members
of the list too.
Please Jeffrey, no more such messages.
I
The December 2013 early year-end edition of The Dramatic Growth of Open Access
focuses on a few of the indicators that this dramatic growth features many high
quality open access resources. For example, the number of PubMed searches that
link to free full-text within 3 years of publication is
