It's a fair point that academics do need to think more carefully about what
boards and initiatives they join and the consequences of giving credibility
to them - but to me again this (at least for more junior academics) comes
down to the need to have good mentorship and advice in helping people
What about the idea : research published only non profit OA journals
should be taken into account.
Wouldn't this push the predatory OA journals by competition out of
business ?
I think that this again supports the conclusion that the idea of
journals altogether should be discarded, as
I don’t know whether predatory publishing is getting more attention than it
deserves. What I do know is that OA advocates have been saying as much for as
long as the phenomenon has existed. In that time the number of papers published
in predatory journals has grown constantly. If my maths is
Dear all,
Excuse my question if it is the one of a not yet well informed person
(me).
I wonder if there is any concerned and organized activity to have the
financing institutions (NIH, NSF, CNRS, and the like in every contry +
the large private institutions, the Gates Foundation ...) be
Dear Graham,
You are right. We simply cannot accept any journal where anyone has to
pay anything. There is no place for money exchange in knowledge
published in scholarly journals. Any monetary exchange could lead,
sooner or later, to malversations and corruptions or limit to access to
the
On 10/09/2015 11:37:02, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote:
What about the idea : research published only non profit OA journals should be
taken into account.
Wouldn't this push the predatory OA journals by competition out of business ?
Well, first, try and define what your criteria for
At least in Anglo-USA law a for profit organisation is one which is
authorised to distribute surpluses to its owners, whereas a 'non profit'
organisation is not so authorised and must allocate any surplus to the
purposes for which it was established.
Thus a '(non) profit' organisation is not