Re: [GOAL] Elsevier as an open access publisher

Thanks to Ross for this information which I argue supports my argument that Elsevier is now a major OA publisher. With apologies for duplication, here are some other points made in the article others may wish to comment on: - most of Elsevier’s fully OA journals do not charge APCs -

Re: [GOAL] Elsevier as an open access publisher

Elsevier self-report (trustworthy?) more relevant article-level data here: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/elsevier-publishing-a-look-at-the-numbers-and-more "We ended 2015 as the 4th largest open access publisher, with 20,000 open access (author or funder paid) articles in 2015." Note, to make

Re: [GOAL] Elsevier as an open access publisher

On 13 January 2017 at 16:57, Heather Morrison wrote: > Elsevier is now one of the world’s largest open access publishers as > measured by the number of fully OA journals published. What are the > implications? There are precisely no implications. The number of

[GOAL] Elsevier as an open access publisher

Elsevier is now one of the world’s largest open access publishers as measured by the number of fully OA journals published. What are the implications? I’d love to hear your thoughts, on list or on the SKC blogpost (see link below). Morrison, H. (2017). From the field: Elsevier as an open

[GOAL] OpenAIRE OA Impact Workshop, Oslo, 14 Feb 2017

Dear list members, OpenAIRE is pleased to invite you to an international workshop focusing on the topic of measuring Open Access and its impact, to take place in Oslo, Norway, on Tuesday the 14th of February 2017. The event is free of charge and open to everyone. Work on international