Hello all
I rarely intervene here but take a chance to agree with Jean-Claude and even
suggest to take care with the new current of moralisation of science that I
analyse here (on its other aspects that now seem to touch open access and open
science…):
GLOBAL
in. I'm convinced that in the long run academia will
recognize that. You can already see it happening in e.g. Germany, UK and the
Netherlands.
Best,
Jeroen
Op 6 apr. 2015 om 08:36 heeft Gingras, Yves
gingras.y...@uqam.camailto:gingras.y...@uqam.ca het volgende geschreven:
In any given
and the silence of the Brazilian
researchers
This would seem to me the more naïve idea of all: the hierarchy of the
legitimate journals . Legitimate according to who?
El 5/4/2015 1:21, Gingras, Yves
gingras.y...@uqam.camailto:gingras.y...@uqam.ca escribió:
Hello all
In all this debate about what
of the past
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Gingras, Yves
Sent: zondag 5 april 2015 1:48
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] RE : Re: The Qualis and the silence of the Brazilian researchers
Hello all
In all this debate about
Hello all
In all this debate about what are obviously predatory journals that just want
to make fast money before disappearing, has anybody asked the basic question:
do we really need any new journal in any scientific field? There are already
plenty of legitimate journals around in most
Surlignage pippa.sm...@gmail.com pippa.sm...@gmail.com:
As a comparator, I can get water free from rivers but I'm happy to pay
someone to clean it up and pipe it to me.
It seems to be a better comparison is between choosing free water from tap and
pay for bottled water.
:)
Yves Gingras
