10 décembre 2013 21:50
> *À :* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
> *Objet :* [GOAL] Re: [***SPAM***] Don't Conflate OA with Peer-Review
> Reform
>
>
>
> Stevan,
>
>
>
> I think it is perfectly possible to discuss and promote experiments with
> m
3 21:50
> *À :* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
> *Objet :* [GOAL] Re: [***SPAM***] Don't Conflate OA with Peer-Review
> Reform
>
>
>
> Stevan,
>
>
>
> I think it is perfectly possible to discuss and promote experiments with
> more effective and us
List (Successor of AmSci)
Objet : [GOAL] Re: [***SPAM***] Don't Conflate OA with Peer-Review Reform
Stevan,
I think it is perfectly possible to discuss and promote experiments with more
effective and useful review whilst keeping full force in switching to 100% OA.
They are not prerequisit
Stevan,
I think it is perfectly possible to discuss and promote experiments with more
effective and useful review whilst keeping full force in switching to 100% OA.
They are not prerequisites for one another. We cannot stop thinking and
hypothesizing about innovation in scholarly communication,
